ArticleFarmaceuticos comunitarios2025
[Multidisciplinary approach for a patient with morbid obesity and psychological issues led from the pharmacy office].
Article in Farmaceuticos comunitarios, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Abstract: A 58-year-old woman diagnosed with diabetes and hypercholesterolemia and undergoing treatment for breast cancer. Take metformin, rosuvastatin, and anastrozole. She goes to the community pharmacy to pick up a treatment for flatulence that has been prescribed to her in primary care. The prescribed medications are dispensed: Clebopride/Simeticone and paracetamol in addition to asking the pharmacy for a shower gel without detergent for back irritations. After 5 days of treatment, the patient returns requesting a more powerful analgesic since the pain has worsened.The patient was referred to the emergency department upon detection of an MRI of Necessity related to an untreated health problem. In the emergency department, he undergoes an ultrasound and intravenous analgesics that relieve the pain, diagnoses nephritic colic and prescribes metamizole and tramadol/paracetamol. The next day the patient goes to her primary care doctor and he tells her to continue with the prescribed treatment in the emergency room.The patient goes to the community pharmacy again requesting something for the rashes on her back since the gel does not calm her. The pharmacist makes a second referral to the doctor, with a written communication of suspicion of Herpes Zoster, the doctor accepts the intervention and changes the treatment by putting Valacyclovir, paracetamol/codeine and capsaicin cream. The patient returns to the pharmacy reporting that the doctor was surprised that it was a pharmacist who gave the correct diagnosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.