ReviewInternational journal of nanomedicine2025
Nitric Oxide Therapeutics: New Hopes for More Effective Tuberculosis Treatment Combine with Targeted and Controlled Nanotechnology.
Review in International journal of nanomedicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Molecular characterization and functional effect on canie peripheral blood mononuclear cells of phosphoglycerate kinase from Echinococcus granulosus.Parasitology research · 2026Article
- Macrophage targeted cellular microparticles synergize anti-tuberculosis therapy combining CircRNA-mediated host immune defense and antibiotic killing.Materials today. Bio · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Tuberculosis (TB) caused by Mycobacterium tuberculosis (Mtb) is one of the most prevalent infectious diseases worldwide. Nitric oxide (NO) is produced by the reaction of arginine and oxygen catalyzed by nitric oxide synthase (NOS) in mammals. Several studies have highlighted the potential therapeutic use of NO for the treatment of various diseases, including infectious diseases. NO plays a direct bactericidal role by damaging the bacterial DNA, proteins, and enzymes. Additionally, it plays a role in modulating immune cell function, contributing to their anti-tuberculosis (anti-TB) effects by regulating macrophage activity. NO has also been shown to eliminate bacterial biofilms, thereby increasing drug sensitivity of drug-resistant bacteria. Therefore, combining NO with antibiotics may be a strategy for treating drug-resistant tuberculosis (DR-TB). However, owing to the limitations of NO, including their short half-life, instability, and cytotoxicity, exogenous supplementation with NO donors has emerged as a promising alternative therapy. Rapid advancements in nanotechnology have led to the development of nanoparticles (NPs) as drug delivery platforms, at the same time, using strategies such as introducing selective organ targeting (SORT) molecules into nanocarrier systems or preparing nanodrugs in inhalable or dry powder inhalation forms can increase the accumulation of nanodrugs in the lungs. Combined with host-directed therapy strategies, this can improve the therapeutic effect on tuberculosis and shorten the treatment time. This review summarizes the biological activities of NO and introduces their applications in the treatment of several major infectious diseases, followed by a systemic analysis of the role and mechanism of action of NO in TB treatment. Moreover, nanotechnology-assisted NO therapeutics are also summarized to explore the potential for more effective Mtb killing based on the advantages of targeted NO release at the infected site and host cells, thus benefiting the development of more effective therapeutics against TB and drug-resistant TB.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.