ArticleiScience2025
A deep learning-based computer-aided diagnosis system for detecting atypical endometrial hyperplasia and endometrial cancer through hysteroscopy.
Article in iScience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Deep learning assisting the surgical management of gynecologic cancers.Current opinion in oncology · 2026Review
- Artificial Intelligence, Deep Learning, and Computer Vision in Hysteroscopy: A Systematic Review.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Endometrial Hyperplasia: Current Insights into Epidemiology, Risk Factors, and Clinical Management.Cancers · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Timely diagnosis of endometrial cancer (EC) and atypical endometrial hyperplasia (AEH) is crucial, yet traditional hysteroscopy faces accuracy challenges. This study introduces ECCADx, a deep learning-based computer-aided diagnosis system utilizing contrastive learning for hysteroscopic identification of AEH and EC. This is the system to integrate contrastive learning for this specific differentiation. ECCADx leveraged contrastive learning during pre-training on diverse external medical images, extracting robust features. Trained on 49,646 images from 1,204 patients, it underwent rigorous multicenter validation on two independent test datasets (6,228 images from 190 patients). ECCADx consistently achieved high diagnostic accuracy, often surpassing experienced endoscopists. Notably, it attained 95.2% sensitivity and 91.3% specificity on the internal dataset, and 92.1% sensitivity with 100% specificity on the external dataset. ECCADx proves a reliable tool, comparable or superior to human experts, promising to reduce misdiagnosis and improve patient outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.