ArticleJournal of exercise science and fitness2025
Influence of local and remote ischemic preconditioning on 3-min all-out exercise performance: A randomized controlled crossover study.
Article in Journal of exercise science and fitness, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Trial
- Benefits of 6-weeks high-intensity circuit training with or without blood flow restriction on physical fitness in active males: A randomized controlled trial.Journal of exercise science and fitness · 2026Article
- Acute effects of ischemic preconditioning and isometric exercise on blood pressure in prehypertensive males.Journal of exercise science and fitness · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: This study investigated the influences of local ischemic preconditioning (LIPC) and remote ischemic preconditioning (RIPC) on muscle deoxygenation before and during a 3-min all-out cycling test (3 MT), as well as on 3 MT performance. Methods: Fifteen male athletes completed LIPC (thighs, 220 mmHg, 4 × 5 min), RIPC (upper limbs, 30 mmHg above systolic blood pressure, 4 × 5 min), and SHAM (thighs, 20 mmHg, 4 × 5 min) interventions in a randomized crossover design, with a 4-day washout period between sessions. The 3 MT was conducted 45 min after each intervention. Parameters derived from the 3 MT included end-test power output (EP) and the work performed above EP (WEP). Muscle oxygenation of the thigh and blood biochemical variables (lactate, pH, nitric oxide, and norepinephrine) were assessed before and during exercise. Results: During the resting period between the intervention and the 3 MT, deoxyhemoglobin and total hemoglobin were significantly higher in the LIPC condition than in RIPC and SHAM ( Conclusion: LIPC increased muscle total hemoglobin during the post-intervention resting period, particularly within 10 min of the final occlusion. However, neither LIPC nor RIPC improved performance during high-intensity cycling exercise.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.