ReviewEwha medical journal2025
Impact of pulmonary tuberculosis on lung cancer screening: a narrative review.
Review in Ewha medical journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Recent advances in pulmonary tuberculosis, the application of deep learning to medical topics, and highlights from this issue ofEwha medical journal · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Lung cancer remains a leading cause of cancer-related mortality worldwide. Low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) screening has demonstrated efficacy in reducing lung cancer mortality by enabling early detection. In several countries, including Korea, LDCT-based screening for high-risk populations has been incorporated into national healthcare policies. However, in regions with a high tuberculosis (TB) burden, the effectiveness of LDCT screening for lung cancer may be influenced by TB-related pulmonary changes. Studies indicate that the screen-positive rate in TB-endemic areas differs from that in low-TB prevalence regions. A critical challenge is the differentiation between lung cancer lesions and TB-related abnormalities, which can contribute to false-positive findings and increase the likelihood of unnecessary invasive procedures. Additionally, structural lung damage from prior TB infections can alter LDCT interpretation, potentially reducing diagnostic accuracy. Nontuberculous mycobacterial infections further complicate this issue, as their radiologic features frequently overlap with those of TB and lung cancer, necessitating additional microbiologic confirmation. Future research incorporating artificial intelligence and biomarkers may enhance diagnostic precision and facilitate a more personalized approach to lung cancer screening in TB-endemic settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.