Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40703327›Full record

ReviewCureus2025

Intensive Care Unit-Based Medical Education for Medical Students: A Scoping Review.

Joseph L Kim, Yohan Kim

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Joseph L KimEmergency Medicine, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, USA.
Yohan KimNeurocritical Care, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As medical students and graduates are increasingly exposed and expected to recognize critically ill patients, the role of the intensive care unit (ICU) training in graduate medical education has drawn growing attention. This scoping review maps the current landscape of ICU-based education for medical students, focusing on the importance of early ICU exposure, teaching methods employed, learner outcomes, and gaps in literature. Peer-reviewed articles published between 2015 to 2025 were identified through searches from PubMed, Scopus, and Google Scholar using terms such as "medical education ICU" and "ICU training medical students". Titles and abstracts were screened, followed by full-text reviews. Twenty-four articles met inclusion criteria and were analyzed thematically. The findings suggest that ICU training improves knowledge, clinical skills, and self-confidence among medical students, especially when programs incorporate active learning strategies such as simulation, case-based teaching, and bedside participation. However, access to ICU rotations remains inconsistent, and many students worldwide report limited exposure. Gaps identified include a lack of standardized curricula, limited outcome-based research, and de-emphasis on non-technical skills like communication and ethics. While ICU education offers clear benefits, widespread integration into medical curricula remains uneven. Future efforts should prioritize curriculum development, faculty support, and equitable access to ensure all graduates are better prepared for acute care responsibilities.

Indexed as

clinical educationcritical care educationgraduate medical educationicu educationintensive care unitmedical educationmedical student educationscoping review

Identifiers

PMID40703327
PMCPMC12284912

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.