ReviewCureus2025
Intensive Care Unit-Based Medical Education for Medical Students: A Scoping Review.
Review in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Better teaching in the ICU: from educational principles to case-based, visualization-guided, and AI-enhanced training infrastructure.Critical care (London, England) · 2026Article
- Integrating sustainability into critical care undergraduate education: preparing future physicians for a climate-conscious practice.Intensive care medicine · 2026Article
- Integrating sustainability into critical care undergraduate education: preparing future physicians for a climate-conscious practice. Author's reply.Intensive care medicine · 2026Article
- An innovative paradigm of intensive care: hot pot pattern.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
As medical students and graduates are increasingly exposed and expected to recognize critically ill patients, the role of the intensive care unit (ICU) training in graduate medical education has drawn growing attention. This scoping review maps the current landscape of ICU-based education for medical students, focusing on the importance of early ICU exposure, teaching methods employed, learner outcomes, and gaps in literature. Peer-reviewed articles published between 2015 to 2025 were identified through searches from PubMed, Scopus, and Google Scholar using terms such as "medical education ICU" and "ICU training medical students". Titles and abstracts were screened, followed by full-text reviews. Twenty-four articles met inclusion criteria and were analyzed thematically. The findings suggest that ICU training improves knowledge, clinical skills, and self-confidence among medical students, especially when programs incorporate active learning strategies such as simulation, case-based teaching, and bedside participation. However, access to ICU rotations remains inconsistent, and many students worldwide report limited exposure. Gaps identified include a lack of standardized curricula, limited outcome-based research, and de-emphasis on non-technical skills like communication and ethics. While ICU education offers clear benefits, widespread integration into medical curricula remains uneven. Future efforts should prioritize curriculum development, faculty support, and equitable access to ensure all graduates are better prepared for acute care responsibilities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.