Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40703322›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in pediatrics2025

The influence of family in children's feeding difficulties: an integrative review.

Pâmela Gracielle da Fonseca, António Raposo, Nada Alqarawi, Ibrahim Alasqah, Mariana Figueiredo Pinto, Tábata Monaliza Marcelino Martins, Viviane Dias Gonçalves, Simone Cardoso Lisboa Pereira, Najla A Albaridi, Mona N BinMowyna and 2 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in pediatrics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Pâmela Gracielle da FonsecaDepartment of Nutrition, Nursing School, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Brazil.
António RaposoCBIOS (Research Center for Biosciences and Health Technologies), ECTS (School of Health Sciences and Technologies), Lusófona University, Lisboa, Portugal.
Nada AlqarawiDepartment of Psychiatric and Mental Health, and Community Health, College of Nursing, Qassim University, Buraydah, Saudi Arabia.
Ibrahim AlasqahDepartment of Psychiatric and Mental Health, and Community Health, College of Nursing, Qassim University, Buraydah, Saudi Arabia.
Mariana Figueiredo PintoDepartment of Nutrition, Nursing School, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Brazil.
Tábata Monaliza Marcelino MartinsDepartment of Nutrition, Nursing School, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Brazil.
Viviane Dias GonçalvesDepartment of Nutrition, Ibirité City Hall, Ibirité, Brazil.
Simone Cardoso Lisboa PereiraDepartment of Nutrition, Nursing School, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Brazil.
Najla A AlbaridiDepartment of Health Science, College of Health and Rehabilitation, Princess Nourah Bint Abdulrahman University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Mona N BinMowynaCollege of Education, Shaqra University, Shaqra, Saudi Arabia.
Ariana SaraivaResearch in Veterinary Medicine (I-MVET), Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Lisbon University Centre, Lusófona University, Lisboa, Portugal.
Nathalia Sernizon GuimarãesDepartment of Nutrition, Nursing School, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Feeding difficulties, such as limited appetite, selective eating, and food phobia, affect caregivers' ability to provide adequate nutrition to children. These issues impact 25%-40% of non-neurodivergent children and up 80% of neurodivergent children. Aim: This review examines how family involvement influences the improvement, worsening, or maintenance of feeding difficulties in neurodivergent and non-neurodivergent preschool and school-age children. Methods: An integrative review was conducted using Embase, PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane Library, Lilacs and grey literature (Google Scholar and Connect Papers). The review focused on randomized clinical trials (RCTs) involving parents or caregivers of children aged 2-10 years, assessing lifestyle or psychological interventions. Results: From 1,257 studies, 885 primary articles were screened. Of the 100 most recent articles on grey literature, 2 met the eligibility criteria after full-text assessment and were therefore included in the review. Thirty-six studies were reviewed in full, leading to 11 RCTs with 630 children aged 1 to 14. Interventions included behavioral education, sensory education, and cooking classes. Findings indicated increased vegetable acceptance in two studies, improved feeding difficulties scores in five, and reduced avoidant/restrictive food intake disorder (ARFID) symptoms in two studies. One study showed no significant differences between control and intervention groups. Conclusion: Family-involved interventions generally produced positive outcomes in managing feeding difficulties. However, methodological variability and the predominance of studies from high-income countries limit the generalizability of these results. Future research should focus on standardizing diagnostic criteria and developing culturally sensitive interventions.

Indexed as

avoidant restrictive food intake disorderchildfamily assistancefamily relationsfood preferencesfood selectionneophobiapreschool

Identifiers

PMID40703322
PMCPMC12283677

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.