ArticleFrontiers in pediatrics2025
Boys born with hypospadias and fetal growth restriction exhibit shorter anogenital distances: a retrospective cross-sectional study.
Article in Frontiers in pediatrics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Association between anogenital distance and hypospadias: a systematic review and meta-analysis.European journal of pediatrics · 2026Pooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Hypospadias is a common congenital urological malformation in males, potentially associated with inadequate prenatal androgen exposure. Anogenital distances (AGDs) are biomarkers of prenatal androgen action, while fetal growth restriction (FGR) may impair gonadal development and hormone levels. This study aims to investigate the relationship between AGDs and different severities of hypospadias, with a specific focus on the impact of FGR. Methods: A retrospective observational study was conducted on male pediatric patients treated at Shanghai Children's Hospital between August 2019 and January 2023. Patients were divided into the control group and the hypospadias group, with the latter further classified into distal, middle, and proximal subgroups based on urethral meatus location. AGDs, including anoscrotal distance (ASD), AGD-1, and AGD-2, were measured under anesthesia. Linear regression analysis was performed to assess the associations between AGDs, hypospadias severity, and FGR indicators, including low birth weight (LBW) and small for gestational age (SGA). Results: A total of 386 pediatric patients were included, with 205 in the control group and 181 in the hypospadias group. Patients with hypospadias exhibited significantly shorter AGDs compared to the control group ( Conclusion: Boys with hypospadias and FGR exhibit significantly shorter AGDs, with more severe hypospadias and SGA showing the strongest associations. This study provides a foundation for future clinical assessments and research into prenatal factors influencing male genital development.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.