ArticleFrontiers in medicine2025
Three case reports of pulmonary mucormycosis with a review of the literature.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Pulmonary mucormycosis with endobronchial involvement due toMedical mycology case reports · 2026Article
- Clinical features, management, and outcomes of pulmonary mucormycosis: a decade-long retrospective study from a single center in central China.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Diagnostic Utility of Bronchoalveolar Lavage Metagenomic Next-Generation Sequencing for Pulmonary Mucormycosis: A Single-Center Retrospective Cohort Study.Infection and drug resistance · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Pulmonary mucormycosis (PM) is an invasive and life-threatening fungal infection that predominantly affects immunocompromised individuals. This study thoroughly examined the disease through three case reports and a literature review. Case 1 involved a patient with type 1 diabetes mellitus diagnosed through bronchoscopic histopathology, who succumbed despite a combination of oral isavuconazole, nebulized amphotericin B, and intravenous amphotericin B cholesteryl sulfate complex. Case 2 involved a patient with follicular non-Hodgkin lymphoma who had a concurrent coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) infection, which was confirmed through metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS) of bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF). The patient experienced clinical improvement following sequential intravenous voriconazole, amphotericin B cholesteryl sulfate complex, and oral isavuconazole. Case 3 involved a patient diagnosed with mNGS in a lung cancer patient with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, who showed poor therapeutic response to combined intravenous voriconazole, amphotericin B cholesteryl sulfate complex, and oral isavuconazole, resulting in fatal outcomes. Literature synthesis revealed mortality rates of 28.3% with antifungal monotherapy compared to 23.7% when antifungal monotherapy was combined with bronchoscopic intervention; the mortality rate for antifungal-surgical combination therapy was 9%. Notably, all 13 patients receiving multimodal treatment (antifungals, bronchoscopy, and surgery) survived. These findings underscore that combination therapy integrating pharmacotherapy, bronchoscopic intervention, and surgical resection demonstrated significantly superior survival outcomes compared to monotherapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.