ArticleFrontiers in medicine2025
Artificial liver plasma adsorption improves survival in elderly patients with severe pneumonia: a retrospective cohort study.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To assess the therapeutic efficacy of artificial liver plasma adsorption (ALPA) in patients with severe pneumonia. Methods: This retrospective study enrolled 151 patients meeting severe pneumonia diagnostic criteria who were admitted to the intensive care unit at Shulan Hospital, Hangzhou, China, between January 2020 and December 2024. Participants were allocated to either: (1) the ALPA intervention group ( Results: No statistically significant differences were observed between the two groups regarding WBC, CRP, PCT, or IL-6 levels at baseline (all Conclusion: Artificial liver plasma adsorption (ALPA) therapy demonstrates significant clinical efficacy by effectively suppressing inflammatory markers (e.g., IL-6, CRP) and attenuating cytokine storm progression. This treatment significantly reduces mortality and prolongs survival time in elderly patients with severe pneumonia.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.