ArticleFrontiers in medicine2025
Laparoscopy-assisted uterovaginal anastomosis in a patient with atypical cervicovaginal malformation: a case report.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cervicovaginal anomalies are rare and form 4-7% of the Müllerian anomalies. Traditionally, cervicovaginal agenesis/dysgenesis had been treated by hysterectomy due to the high risks of restenosis and sepsis which are associated with cervical canalization. In this work, we report the case of a 14-year-old patient who presented with amenorrhea and cyclic abdominal pain. The patient had normal secondary sexual development. Magnetic resonance imaging revealed hematometra and bilateral hematosalpinx. Laparoscopic exploration identified an obstructed cervix and blunt vagina. The patient underwent direct cervicovaginal anastomosis under laparoscopic guidance. After 1 month of follow-up, the patient had normal menstruation and a healthy uterine cavity and cervical canal upon hysteroscopy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.