SynthesisFrontiers in medicine2025
Trends and hotspots in cupping therapy research for pain: a bibliometric study.
Synthesis in Frontiers in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- High-flow nasal oxygen in perioperative and critical care: a bibliometric analysis.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Pooled it
- Effects of fire dragon cupping therapy for patients with post-stroke shoulder-hand syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in neurology · 2026Pooled it
- A dual-database bibliometric analysis on dry needling for pain: Global trends and hotspots from web of science core collection and Scopus (2006-2025).Frontiers in neurologyPooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Cupping therapy (CT), a traditional form of alternative medicine, has gained attention as a non-pharmacological intervention for pain. Its applications span various pain-related conditions such as musculoskeletal disorders, migraines. Despite its growing popularity, comprehensive analyses of research trends, collaboration networks, and emerging hotspots in CT for pain remain limited. Methods: This bibliometric study analyzed 234 publications on CT for pain sourced from the Web of Science Core Collection. CiteSpace and VOSviewer software, and Bibliometric analysis website were employed to analyze trends, identify key contributors, and map global collaboration networks. Co-cited references, keyword clustering, and burst detection analyses were performed to uncover research hotspots and trends. Results: A total of 234 publications from 31 countries and 437 institutions were included. China led in publication volume, while the United States had the highest total citations. The Korea Institute of Oriental Medicine and the University of Duisburg-Essen were identified as central hubs for institutional collaboration. High-frequency keywords such as "pain," "cupping therapy," "acupuncture," and "negative pressure" highlighted a focus on CT's clinical applications and mechanisms. Emerging trends included the integration of CT with modalities like acupuncture and physical therapy. However, methodological limitations, such as inconsistent protocols and insufficient mechanistic studies, were identified as key challenges. Conclusion: This study offers an overview of the research landscape for CT in pain management, its potential as a safe and effective therapy. To strengthen its role in evidence-based medicine, future research should focus on standardizing treatment protocols, conducting high-quality clinical trials, and exploring its underlying mechanisms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.