ArticleFrontiers in medicine2025
Explainable AI-driven intelligent system for precision forecasting in cardiovascular disease.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Development and validation of an explainable machine learning model for risk stratification in patients with clinically suspected acute pulmonary embolism: retrospective study.Clinics (Sao Paulo, Brazil) · 2026Article
- Explainable Lightweight AI for the Identification of Right-Sided Cardiac Dysfunction in a Saudi Arabian Diabetic Cohort.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Machine Learning for Coronary Heart Disease Prediction: Comparative Analysis of Framingham and Cleveland Subset of the UCI Dataset with SHAP-Based Interpretability.Epidemiologia (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Policy, Financing, and Regulatory Barriers to Adopting AI-Powered Electrocardiography Interpretation Clinical Decision Support System in Ethiopia: A Qualitative Study.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2026Article
- Deep Learning and Cardiovascular Diseases: An Updated Narrative Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- AI enhanced optimization of college physical education programs using hybrid genetic algorithms and learning based fitness evaluation.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- AI-RiskX: An Explainable Deep Learning Approach for Identifying At-Risk Patients During Pandemics.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- The oral microbiome and atherosclerosis: current evidence on association, mechanisms, and clinical implications.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Review
- Cognitive alignment in cardiovascular AI: designing predictive models that think with, not just for, clinicians.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) are complex and affect a large part of the world's population; early accurate and timely prediction is also complicated. Typically, predicting CVDs involves using statistical models and other forms of standard machine learning. Although these methods offer some level of prediction, their black-box nature severely hinders the ability of the healthcare professional to trust and use the predictions. The following are some of the challenges that Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) may solve since it can give an understanding of the decision-making system of AI to build confidence and increase usability. Methods: This research introduced an intelligent forecasting system for cardiovascular events using XAI and addressed the limitations of traditional methods. This proposed system incorporates advanced machine learning algorithms integrated with XAI to examine a dataset comprising 308,737 patient records with features including age, BMI, blood pressure, cholesterol levels, and lifestyle factors. This dataset was sourced from the Kaggle Cardiovascular Disease dataset. Results: Incorporating XAI offers an understandable explanation so that the healthcare professional can understand and make the AI-driven prediction trustworthy enough to improve the decision-making of treatment and care delivery for the patients. The simulation results of the proposed system provide better results than those of the previously published research works in terms of 91.94% accuracy and 8.06% miss rate. Discussion: This proposed system makes it clear that XAI has the potential to significantly improve cardiovascular healthcare by enhancing transparency, reliability, and the quality of patient care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.