Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40703247›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of mental health and addiction2025

A Preliminary Assessment of Short-Term Social and Substance Use-Related Outcomes Among Clients of Integrated Safer Opioid Supply Pilot Programs in Toronto, Canada.

Frishta Nafeh, Tinkhani Mbichila, Zachary Bouck, Ayden Scheim, Sanjana Mitra, Matthew Bonn, Franky Morris, Kate Atkinson, Kate Mason, Jolene Eeuwes and 4 more

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of mental health and addiction, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Perceived impacts of North Americas first de-medicalized safer supply program.Substance abuse treatment, prevention, and policy · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Frishta NafehCentre On Drug Policy Evaluation, MAP Centre for Urban Health Solutions, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, ON Canada.
Tinkhani MbichilaCentre On Drug Policy Evaluation, MAP Centre for Urban Health Solutions, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, ON Canada.
Zachary BouckDalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON Canada.
Ayden ScheimDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Dornsife School of Public Health, Drexel University, Philadelphia, PA USA.
Sanjana MitraCentre On Drug Policy Evaluation, MAP Centre for Urban Health Solutions, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, ON Canada.
Matthew BonnCanadian Association of People Who Use Drugs, Dartmouth, NS Canada.
Franky MorrisStreet Health, Toronto, ON Canada.
Kate AtkinsonParkdale Queen West Community Health Centre, Toronto, ON Canada.
Kate MasonSouth Riverdale Community Health Centre, Toronto, ON Canada.
Jolene EeuwesCentre On Drug Policy Evaluation, MAP Centre for Urban Health Solutions, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, ON Canada.
Carol StrikeDalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON Canada.
Tara GomesLi Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, ON Canada.
Dan WerbCentre On Drug Policy Evaluation, MAP Centre for Urban Health Solutions, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, ON Canada.
Mohammad KaramouzianCentre On Drug Policy Evaluation, MAP Centre for Urban Health Solutions, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, ON Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-5631-4469

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Canada is experiencing an ongoing overdose crisis, driven by a toxic unregulated drug supply. Integrated safer supply pilot programs offer pharmaceutical alternatives, coupled with comprehensive support services, to individuals using unregulated drug supply who are at high risk of overdose. We collected data from December 2020 to January 2023 on clients receiving safer opioid supply from five frontline service providers in Toronto, Canada, using interviewer-administered questionnaires. We assessed the incidence rate ratio of self-reported overdose comparing pre- and post-enrolment in the programs and examined changes in the prevalence of social and substance use outcomes post-enrolment. Forty-one participants were recruited, of whom 26 were followed up for a median of eight months (interquartile range, 5.0-11.7). The incidence rate ratio of overdose comparing post-enrolment to pre-enrolment was 0.20 (95% confidence interval, 0.09-0.43). Participants reported several positive social and substance use outcomes at follow-up, including a reduction in reliance on the unregulated supply and reduced criminal activity. Future implementation of integrated safer opioid supply pilot programs with larger sample sizes and rigorous epidemiological designs could help further illustrate the potential impacts of these programs in reducing overdose rates in Canada. Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11469-023-01219-3.

Indexed as

CanadaHarm ReductionOverdoseSafer Supply

Identifiers

PMID40703247
PMCPMC12279591

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.