Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40703206›Full record

ArticleRegenerative biomaterials2025

Gelatin/hyaluronic acid-based

Xingchen Zhao, Wenling Dai, Chenxin Liu, Mei An, Shikui Li, Likun Guo, Yujiang Fan, Xingdong Zhang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Regenerative biomaterials, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Xingchen ZhaoNational Engineering Research Center for Biomaterials, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan 610064, P.R. China.
Wenling DaiNational Engineering Research Center for Biomaterials, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan 610064, P.R. China.
Chenxin LiuNational Engineering Research Center for Biomaterials, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan 610064, P.R. China.
Mei AnNational Engineering Research Center for Biomaterials, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan 610064, P.R. China.
Shikui LiNational Engineering Research Center for Biomaterials, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan 610064, P.R. China.
Likun GuoNational Engineering Research Center for Biomaterials, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan 610064, P.R. China.
Yujiang FanNational Engineering Research Center for Biomaterials, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan 610064, P.R. China.
Xingdong ZhangNational Engineering Research Center for Biomaterials, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan 610064, P.R. China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The development of advanced hydrogel dressings that integrate biocompatibility, antioxidant activity and dynamic adaptability remains critical for addressing the complex demands of modern wound management. In this study, we designed a multinetwork hydrogel (GHrCT) through synergistic strategies: A robust covalent network is constructed through photocrosslinked gelatin methacryloyl, while a secondary dynamic network formed via hydrogen bonds and electrostatic interactions is established among dopamine-modified hyaluronic acid (HD), tannic acid (TA) and recombinant collagen type III (rhCol III). Through a series of experiments, we systematically characterized key properties of the hydrogel, including its microscopic morphology, swelling behavior, rheological characteristics and mechanical strength. Biocompatibility was assessed through

Indexed as

antioxidant activitymultinetwork structurenatural polymer hydrogelsrecombinant collagen type IIIwound repair

Identifiers

PMID40703206
PMCPMC12286701

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.