ArticleFrontiers in public health2025
Identifying risk factors for depression and positive/negative mood changes in college students using machine learning.
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Integrating epidemiologic modeling and explainable machine learning to predict and identify factors associated with self-reported depression among adults in Tennessee, United States.Discover mental health · 2026Article
- Mapping Heterogeneity in Psychological Risk Among University Students Using Explainable Machine Learning.Entropy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: In this study, machine learning was used to assess the prediction of the magnitude of depression changes in college students based on various psychological variable information. Methods: A group of college students from a certain school completed two assessments in October 2021 and March 2022, respectively. We collected baseline levels of depression, demographic variables, parenting styles, college students' mental health information, personality information, coping styles, SCL-90, and social support information. We applied logistic regression, random forest, support vector machine, and k-nearest neighbor machine learning methods to predict the magnitude of depression changes in college students. We selected the best-performing model and outputted the importance of features collected at different time points. Results: Whether it is predicting the magnitude of positive changes or negative changes in depression, support vector machines (SVM) had the best prediction performance (with an accuracy of 89.4% for predicting negative changes in depression and an accuracy of 91.9% for predicting positive changes in depression). The baseline level of depression, father's emotional expression, and mother's emotional expression were all important predictors for predicting the negative and positive changes in depression among college students. Conclusion: Machine learning models can predict the extent of depression changes in college students. The baseline level of depression, as well as the emotional state of both fathers and mothers, play a significant role in predicting the negative and positive changes associated with depression in college students. This provides new insights and methods for future psychological health research and practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.