Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40703187›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in public health2025

Factor structure and predictors of causal beliefs about seven mental illnesses among the Singapore general population.

Yoke Boon Tan, Eng Hong Tay, Shazana Shahwan, Savita Gunasekaran, Benedict Wei Zhi Lim, Bernard Chin Wee Tan, Wei Jie Ong, Saleha Shafie, Edimansyah Abdin, Porsche Poh and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Yoke Boon TanResearch Division, Institute of Mental Health, Singapore, Singapore.
Eng Hong TayResearch Division, Institute of Mental Health, Singapore, Singapore.
Shazana ShahwanResearch Division, Institute of Mental Health, Singapore, Singapore.
Savita GunasekaranResearch Division, Institute of Mental Health, Singapore, Singapore.
Benedict Wei Zhi LimResearch Division, Institute of Mental Health, Singapore, Singapore.
Bernard Chin Wee TanResearch Division, Institute of Mental Health, Singapore, Singapore.
Wei Jie OngResearch Division, Institute of Mental Health, Singapore, Singapore.
Saleha ShafieResearch Division, Institute of Mental Health, Singapore, Singapore.
Edimansyah AbdinResearch Division, Institute of Mental Health, Singapore, Singapore.
Porsche PohSilver Ribbon, Singapore, Singapore.
Georg SchomerusDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University of Leipzig Medical Center, Leipzig, Germany.
Siow Ann ChongResearch Division, Institute of Mental Health, Singapore, Singapore.
Mythily SubramaniamResearch Division, Institute of Mental Health, Singapore, Singapore.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Knowledge about the causes of mental illness is a crucial component of mental health literacy. Poor understanding of the etiology of mental illness can lead to stigmatizing behaviors and hinder access to appropriate help. The current cross-sectional study examined the general population's causal beliefs about seven mental illnesses and explored the factor structure of the revised causal beliefs scale. Methods: Four thousand one hundred ninety-five respondents were randomly assigned a vignette and were asked questions on their recognition of the mental illness depicted, causal beliefs, and prior experience related to the mental illness (similar problems, had a mental health-related job or family and friends with similar problems). Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses were used to examine the factor structure of the causal beliefs scale. Multivariable linear regression was used to examine its predictors. Results: Factor analyses revealed a four-factor structure of causal beliefs: physical, psychosocial, personality, and biogenetic. Causal beliefs differed across the vignettes. Compared to schizophrenia, biogenetic beliefs were less likely to be endorsed for all mental illnesses except dementia, while personality beliefs were more likely to be endorsed for depression with suicidality. Compared to respondents who did not recognize the mental illness, those with correct recognition were more likely to endorse biogenetic and psychosocial beliefs, and less likely to endorse physical and personality beliefs. Discussion: Factor structure of the original causal beliefs scale was found to be valid in the Singapore population. Individuals who correctly recognized the mental illness appeared to comprehend its etiology well. However, some misconceptions about the etiology of mental illness persist, particularly with regards to relating obsessive-compulsive disorder to physical factors (e.g., virus) and depression with suicidality to personality flaws. As future awareness campaigns continue to address the gaps in literacy levels, careful promotion of certain causal beliefs is crucial to avoid conveying unintended messages.

Indexed as

Health Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeMental DisordersAdolescentAdultAgedCross-Sectional StudiesFactor Analysis, StatisticalFemaleHealth LiteracyHumansMaleMiddle AgedSingaporeSurveys and QuestionnairesYoung Adultcausal beliefsfactor structuregeneral populationmental health literacymental illness

Identifiers

PMID40703187
PMCPMC12283601

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.