Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40703171›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in public health2025

The role of the Chief Health Strategist in community health improvement: a MAPP 2.0 counterproposal.

Angela L Carman, Mary Elizabeth Pendergrass

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Angela L CarmanHealth Management and Policy, University of Kentucky College of Public Health, Lexington, KY, United States.
Mary Elizabeth PendergrassPublic Health Policy and Practice Apprentice, University of Kentucky College of Public Health, Lexington, KY, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the past 10 years, several significant national initiatives have released updated strategies and guidelines to improve public health practice specifically as it relates to community health improvement. These initiatives include the 2016 release of Public Health 3.0 by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) Office of the Assistant Secretary for Health (OASH), which defines the concept of the Chief Health Strategist as a leader in the community's health improvement efforts. In addition, in 2022, the Public Health Accreditation Board (PHAB) released guidance for community health improvement through a revised set of accreditation standards and measures, which included a list of suggested models such as Mobilizing for Action through Planning and Partnerships (MAPP) to guide the process. Finally, a revised model, MAPP 2.0, was released in 2023 to provide updates to the National Association of County and City Health Officials' (NACCHO's) original framework for community health improvement. Despite the valuable information for a collaborative approach to community health improvement found in the 2022 PHAB accreditation standards and measures and in MAPP 2.0, the role of the Chief Health Strategist from Public Health 3.0 is missing. This article describes the importance of the role of the Chief Health Strategist in community health improvement, emphasizing community trust-building, the ability to galvanize community group participation, and the use of systems thinking and decision-making to create a counterproposal to the guidelines presented in MAPP 2.0.

Indexed as

LeadershipProfessional RolePublic HealthQuality ImprovementAccreditationHumansUnited StatesChief Health Strategistcommunity health improvementcommunity partnersdecision makingtrust

Identifiers

PMID40703171
PMCPMC12283569

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.