ArticleEuropean heart journal. Digital health2025
A deep foundation model for electrocardiogram interpretation: enabling rare disease detection through transfer learning.
Article in European heart journal. Digital health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Artificial Intelligence in Neuromuscular Diseases: Opportunities for a Data-Scarce Field.Neurology and therapy · 2026Review
- AI-ECG classification for Brugada syndrome: A study of machine learning techniques to optimise for limited datasets.PLOS digital health · 2026Article
- The global roadmap for cardiovascular imaging: bridging the diagnostic divide.European heart journal. Imaging methods and practice · 2026Review
- Foundation model-guided multi-view semi-supervised CT segmentation of liver tumors in resource-constrained settings.NPJ digital medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In healthcare, scarcity of high-quality human-adjudicated labelled data may limit the potential of deep neural networks (DNNs). Foundation models provide an efficient starting point for deep learning that can facilitate effective DNN training with fewer labelled training examples. In this study, we leveraged cardiologist-confirmed labels from a large dataset of 1.6 million electrocardiograms (ECGs) acquired as part of routine clinical care at UCSF between 1986 and 2019 to pre-train a convolutional DNN to predict 68 common ECG diagnoses. To our knowledge, this model is one of the most comprehensive ECG DNN models to date, demonstrating high performance with a median area under the receiver operating curve (AUC) of 0.978, median sensitivity of 0.937, and median specificity of 0.923. We then demonstrate the model's utility as a foundation model by additionally training (fine-tuning) the DNN to detect three novel ECG diagnoses with relatively small datasets: carcinoid syndrome, pericardial constriction, and rheumatic doming of the mitral valve. Fine-tuning training of the foundation model achieved an AUC of 0.772 (95% CI 0.723-0.816) for carcinoid syndrome, 0.883 (0.863-0.906) for pericardial constriction, and 0.826 (95% CI 0.802-0.854) for rheumatic doming, compared to 0.492 (95% CI 0.434-0.558), 0.689 (95% CI 0.656-0.720), and 0.701 (95% CI 0.657-0.745), respectively, for DNNs trained from scratch on the same small datasets. Our results demonstrate that the ECG foundation model learned a flexible representation of ECG waveforms and can improve performance of fine-tuned downstream models, particularly in data-limited settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.