ArticleEuropean heart journal. Digital health2025
Evaluation of seismocardiography in detecting pre-load changes and cardiovascular disease: a comparative study with transthoracic echocardiography.
Article in European heart journal. Digital health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Clinical Readiness of Hemodynamic Estimation from Cardiac Vibration Signals: An Endpoint-Specific Critical Review.Annals of biomedical engineering · 2026Review
- A feasibility study evaluating seismocardiography for the detection of heart failure.PLOS digital health · 2026Article
- Article
- AI-Enabled Sensor Technologies for Remote Arrhythmic Monitoring in High-Risk Cardiomyopathy Genotypes.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aims: This study aimed to test whether seismocardiography (SCG) can detect changes in loading conditions and detect significant differences in SCG signals between healthy individuals and those with cardiovascular disease (CVD). Methods and results: Twenty-six subjects (age 45 ± 16 years and 77% male) were included, 11 healthy subjects and 15 subjects with CVD. SCG was compared with transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) before and after infusion of 2 L of isotonic saline. Nine subjects (34%) with CVD did not tolerate the full infusion (2 L infusion intolerant), while the remaining 17 subjects (2 L infusion tolerant) successfully completed the infusion. Significant changes in SCG measurements were observed after infusion, including amplitudes Ls (19%, Conclusion: SCG can detect changes in pre-load in both healthy subjects and subjects with CVD. SCG were also able to detect differences in SCG diastolic amplitudes between infusion-tolerant and -intolerant subjects, which may indicate ability to detect diastolic dysfunction and differences in left ventricular filling pressures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.