ArticleEuropean heart journal. Digital health2025
Effect of a digital health intervention on outpatients with heart failure: a randomized, controlled trial.
Article in European heart journal. Digital health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Use of a digital health solution after percutaneous coronary intervention: a randomised controlled trial.Frontiers in digital health · 2026Trial
- Remote Patient Monitoring in Heart Failure: A Systematic Review, Meta-Analysis, and Trial Sequential Analysis.Cureus · 2026Review
- Enhancing Psychological Health and Weight-Related Behaviors in Older Adults Through Digital Interventions: Findings from theClinical gerontologist · 2026Article
- Digital Medicine in the Management of Heart Failure: From Reactive Care to Predictive, Pathophysiology-Driven Strategies.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aims: Heart failure (HF) is associated with high mortality and reduced quality of life (QoL). Interventions encouraging a healthy lifestyle and self-care can reduce morbidity and HF-related hospitalizations. We conducted a randomized controlled trial (RCT) to assess the impact of a digital health programme on QoL and clinical outcomes of patients. The programme included remote patient monitoring (RPM), self-care, HF education, and empowered positive lifestyle changes. Methods and results: Patients ( Conclusion: Although the digital programme did not improve health-related QoL, it led to benefits in other important outcomes such as self-care, disease-specific knowledge, and several key metabolic parameters.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.