ArticleEuropean heart journal. Digital health2025
Novel artificial intelligence model using electrocardiogram for detecting acute myocardial infarction needing revascularization.
Article in European heart journal. Digital health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- From Electrocardiography to the Catheterization Laboratory: A Multimodal Artificial Intelligence Framework for Acute Coronary Syndrome Detection and Risk Stratification.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Article
- Twenty-Year Clinical Experience of the Korea Acute Myocardial Infarction Registry.Korean circulation journal · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
22 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aims: Rapid myocardial revascularization in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) is essential to improve clinical outcomes. There is still room for improvement in the timely diagnosis of AMI. This study aimed to develop an artificial intelligence (AI) model using electrocardiograms (ECGs) for detecting AMI needing revascularization. Methods and results: A total of 723 389 ECGs from 300 627 patients in the derivation cohort at a single centre between 2013 and 2020, including 5872 patients with AMI (1.95%) who underwent revascularization, were used for model training and internal testing. A transformer-based deep learning model, initially trained on about one million unlabelled ECGs through self-supervised learning, was fine-tuned for AMI detection. The model's final performance was evaluated in the internal test and the external validation set. The external validation was conducted at an independent centre between 2002 and 2020 using 261 429 ECGs from 259 454 patients, including 1095 patients with AMI (0.42%). By integrating self-supervised learning to train the AI model, we enhanced the AMI detection performance, as demonstrated by an increase in the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) from 0.910 (95% CI, 0.904-0.915) to 0.968 (95% CI, 0.965-0.971) in the external validation set. For ST-elevation myocardial infarction and non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction detection, the AUROCs were 0.991 (95% CI, 0.989-0.993) and 0.947 (95% CI, 0.942-0.952) in the external validation set, respectively. Conclusion: This novel ECG-based AI model may be beneficial for the timely identification of patients with AMI needing revascularization.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.