ArticleEuropean heart journal. Digital health2025
The inclusion of a Holter Reading software in the clinical practice of cardiology shows a multi-level high positive impact in healthcare: a real-world implementation study in three Spanish hospitals.
Article in European heart journal. Digital health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aims: Holter monitoring is a high prevalent technique to detect various heart pathologies. Its use has progressively increased over time with the consequent expenditure of time to interpret its results. We aim to evaluate the validity of the Cardiologs software as well as the clinical utility and potential benefits derived from the inclusion of an artificial intelligence (AI)-based software in the clinical routine of the cardiology service. Methods and results: Concordance analyses were performed to determine the degree of correlation between the results reported by the Cardiologs software and cardiologists regarding a list of variables for 498 Holter records included in the study. Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative prediction values, positive and negative likelihood ratios, and odds ratio were calculated. The preliminary analysis reported good correlation between the reported observations by the cardiologists involved in this study (Kappa = 0.67; Conclusion: The inclusion of an AI-based software for reading Holter tests may have great impact in distinguishing normal Holter tests, leading to time savings and improved clinical efficiency.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.