ArticleEuropean heart journal. Digital health2025
A deep learning phenome wide association study of the electrocardiogram.
Article in European heart journal. Digital health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Artificial Intelligence-Enabled Electrocardiography in Practice: A State-of-the-Art Review.Korean circulation journal · 2026Review
- Prototype Learning to Create Refined Interpretable Digital Phenotypes from ECGs.Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing. Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing · 2026Article
- Phenotypic Selectivity of Artificial Intelligence-Enhanced Electrocardiography in Cardiovascular Diagnosis and Risk Prediction.Circulation · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aims: Deep learning methods have shown impressive performance in detecting a range of diseases from electrocardiogram (ECG) waveforms, but the breadth of diseases that can be detected with high accuracy remains unknown, and in many cases the changes to the ECG allowing these classifications are also opaque. In this study, we aim to determine the full set of cardiac and non-cardiac conditions detectable from the ECG and to understand which ECG features contribute to the disease classification. Methods and results: Using large datasets of ECGs and connected electronic health records from two separate medical centres, we independently trained PheWASNet, a multi-task deep learning model, to detect 1243 different disease phenotypes from the raw ECG waveform. We confirmed that the ECG can be used to detect chronic kidney disease (AUC = 0.80), cirrhosis (AUC = 0.80), and sepsis (AUC = 0.84), as well as a range of cardiac diseases, and also found new detectable conditions, including respiratory failure (AUC = 0.86), neutropenia (AUC = 0.83), and menstrual disorders (AUC = 0.84). We found that of the 37 non-cardiac strongly detectable conditions, 35 were detectable by the model output for just four diseases, suggesting that they have similar effects on the ECG. We found that high performance in some conditions including neutropenia, respiratory failure, and sepsis can be explained by linear models based on conventional measurements taken from the ECG. Conclusion: Our study uncovers a range of diseases detectable in the ECG, including many previously unknown phenotypes, and makes progress towards understanding ECG features that allow this detection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.