ArticleComputational structural bioinformatics : international workshop, CSBW 2024, Boston, MA, USA, November 16, 2024, proceedings. Computational Structural Bioinformatics Workshop (2024 : Boston, Mass.)2025
Toward Modeling Protein Multimers by Combining AlphaFold 3 Predictions with Secondary Structures from Medium-Resolution Cryo-EM Maps.
Article in Computational structural bioinformatics : international workshop, CSBW 2024, Boston, MA, USA, November 16, 2024, proceedings. Computational Structural Bioinformatics Workshop (2024 : Boston, Mass.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
AlphaFold 3 (AF3) has recently been shown to offer improved accuracy in predicting the structures of protein multimers. Improved models may lead to new opportunities for fitting them to cryo-electron microscopy (cryo-EM) maps with medium resolution (5-10 Å). Deriving atomic models from such cryo-EM maps is still challenging due to the lack of high-resolution features. Our case study involving four AF3 multimer models and corresponding cryo-EM maps with 7-8 Å resolution showed that the predicted multimer models were partially correct. The predicted models contained fairly accurate domains, secondary structures, and individual chains, since 9 of the 17 chains exhibit TM-scores higher than 0.8 and 16 chains had TM-scores above 0.5 compared with the official atomic structures that were deposited with the cryo-EM maps. However, some cases exhibited incorrect relative positions of individual chains or domains. We observed that the order of cross-correlation (CC) scores between the multimers and their corresponding cryo-EM maps aligned with the order of the TM-scores. This shows that if regions are masked correctly, CC scores are sensitive enough to distinguish among the multimer models. A masking of monomeric chains may not always be attainable, so we also explored the level of accuracy in secondary structure segmentation for one of the cases in greater detail. Although molecular details are not fully visible in cryo-EM maps at medium resolution, the location of major secondary structures, such as α-helices and β-sheets, were detectable using our DeepSSETracer tool. Our analysis illustrates the potential for improvements in the accuracy of AF3-predicted multimer models by combining the density map-model similarity (CC scores) and the secondary structure map-model similarity in a future approach.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.