Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40703073›Full record

ReviewRSC advances2025

Utilization of natural and waste sources for synthesis of cellulose, chitin, and chitosan for a suitable environment.

Bipul Mondal Sagar, Md Mozahidul Islam, Md Lawshan Habib, Samina Ahmed, Md Sahadat Hossain

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in RSC advances, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Bipul Mondal SagarDepartment of Applied Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Gopalganj Science and Technology University Gopalganj Bangladesh lawshanhabibsh20@gmail.com.
Md Mozahidul IslamDepartment of Applied Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Noakhali Science and Technology University Noakhali Bangladesh.
Md Lawshan HabibDepartment of Applied Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Gopalganj Science and Technology University Gopalganj Bangladesh lawshanhabibsh20@gmail.com.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0009-1235-4985
Samina AhmedInstitute of Glass and Ceramic Research and Testing, Bangladesh Council of Scientific and Industrial Research (BCSIR) Dhaka-1205 Bangladesh shanta_samina@yahoo.com saz8455@gamil.com.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6626-3610
Md Sahadat HossainInstitute of Glass and Ceramic Research and Testing, Bangladesh Council of Scientific and Industrial Research (BCSIR) Dhaka-1205 Bangladesh shanta_samina@yahoo.com saz8455@gamil.com.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8273-8559

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The growing need for sustainable materials has sparked interest in natural polymers such as cellulose, chitin, and chitosan. This review explored the synthesis routes and various natural and waste-derived sources of these biopolymers. Chitin and chitosan, obtained primarily from crustaceans, insects, and microorganisms, are economically valuable due to their biodegradability and biocompatibility. Chitosan is produced through demineralization, deproteinization, and deacetylation using either chemical methods or microbial fermentation. Cellulose is extracted from agro-waste (

Identifiers

PMID40703073
PMCPMC12284771

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.