ArticleChemistry, an Asian journal2025
Are Noncovalent C─H⋯ Au Bonds Comparable to C─H⋯ π Bonds? A Theoretical Perspective.
Article in Chemistry, an Asian journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Herein, we have theoretically studied and compared the physical nature of C─H···Au and C─H···π bonds at the PBE0-D3/def2-TZVP level of theory. To achieve this, we have used a series of alkanes exhibiting i) linear, ii) cyclic, and iii) branched geometries and Au and C layers, mimicking a decahedral Au nanoparticle's face and a graphene surface portion, respectively. The calculated supramolecular complexes were compared in terms of their geometry and stability, unveiling interesting trends regarding the i) length, ii) shape, and iii) substitution degree of the aliphatic chain. In addition, they were characterized using the Quantum Theory of Atoms in Molecules (QTAIM) and Non-Covalent Interaction plot (NCIplot) methodologies, which shed light on the aliphatic C─H bond distribution along the complexes as well as the extension in real space of the interactions. Lastly, the Energy Decomposition Analysis (EDA) technique was useful to unveil resemblances/differences in the energetic contributors of both supramolecular forces. We believe that this conceptual study will be of interest to both supramolecular and materials science scientists, owing to the implications of these noncovalent interactions in molecular recognition, catalysis, and solid-state chemistry.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.