Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40702989›Full record

ArticleAnnals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England2026

Adoption of nonwire localisation devices in UK breast units: an iBRA-NET survey to assess changes in practice.

F Mavor, S K Somasundaram, A R Carmichael, S Elgammal, R Foster, S Lowes, Y Masannat, R Milligan, J L Morgan, E R St John and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

F MavorManchester University NHS Foundation Trust, UK.
S K SomasundaramRoyal Lancaster Infirmary, UK.
A R CarmichaelUniversity Hospitals of Derby and Burton NHS Foundation Trust, UK.
S ElgammalNHS Ayrshire and Arran, UK.
R FosterRoyal Liverpool and Broadgreen University Hospital, UK.
S LowesNewcastle University, UK.
Y MasannatMid and South Essex Hospitals NHS Trust, UK.
R MilliganGateshead Health NHS Foundation Trust, UK.
J L MorganUniversity of Sheffield Medical School, UK.
E R St JohnPortsmouth Hospitals University NHS Trust, UK.
R VidyaThe Royal Wolverhampton NHS Trust, UK.
R V DaveManchester University NHS Foundation Trust, UK.
J HarveyManchester University NHS Foundation Trust, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionA national practice questionnaire in 2020 collected data from UK breast surgeons on breast localisation device use, and found that wires were used most frequently. The current study aimed to assess the change in device use since the previous questionnaire, impact on logistics and clinician feedback.

methodsThe 2020 national questionnaire was repeated, as well as adding qualitative questions to elicit themes important to clinicians in differentiating between the quality of localisation device experience. The electronic survey was distributed to UK breast surgeons and radiology members of the Association of Breast Surgery and British Society of Breast Radiology. The medians of the satisfaction responses for each device were compared with the median responses for wire.

resultsThere were 157 completed questionnaires, with 76 responses from surgeons and 81 from radiologists/radiographers, representing 84 UK breast units (August-December 2022). Localisation device use has changed; from 83% wire and 17% nonwire (5% radio-occult lesion localisation, 2% radioiodine seed and 9% Magseed) in 2020 to 18% wire and 82% nonwire (4% radioiodine seed, 49% Magseed, 6% SAVI SCOUT, 20% Hologic LOCalizer and 3% Sirius Pintuition) by 2022. In 2020 6% of patients had localisation performed before the day of surgery versus 65% by 2022 (

conclusionsUK breast surgery practice is shifting from use of guidewires towards newer localisation devices, with resultant logistical benefits and higher clinician satisfaction.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsPractice Patterns, Physicians'BreastFemaleHumansRadiologistsSurgeonsSurveys and QuestionnairesUnited KingdomBreast cancerGuidewireLocalisation deviceMagnetic seedRadar reflectorRFID tag

Identifiers

PMID40702989
PMCPMC12949702

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.