Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40702982›Full record

ArticlePsychological medicine2025

Psychological therapy outcomes by sexual orientation and gender: a retrospective cohort study.

Tom Kent, Jae W Suh, Glyn Lewis, Rob Saunders, Neil M Davies, Gemma Lewis, Lauren Dolby, Joshua E J Buckman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Psychological medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Tom KentDivision of Psychiatry, University College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-3743-2512
Jae W SuhCORE Data Lab, Centre for Outcomes Research and Effectiveness (CORE), Research Department of Clinical, Educational & Health Psychology, University College London, London, UK.
Glyn LewisDivision of Psychiatry, University College London, London, UK.
Rob SaundersCORE Data Lab, Centre for Outcomes Research and Effectiveness (CORE), Research Department of Clinical, Educational & Health Psychology, University College London, London, UK.
Neil M DaviesDivision of Psychiatry, University College London, London, UK.
Gemma LewisDivision of Psychiatry, University College London, London, UK.
Lauren DolbyCORE Data Lab, Centre for Outcomes Research and Effectiveness (CORE), Research Department of Clinical, Educational & Health Psychology, University College London, London, UK.
Joshua E J BuckmanCORE Data Lab, Centre for Outcomes Research and Effectiveness (CORE), Research Department of Clinical, Educational & Health Psychology, University College London, London, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLesbian, gay, and bisexual (LGB) individuals are more than twice as likely to experience anxiety and depression compared with heterosexuals. Minority stress theory posits that stigma and discrimination contribute to chronic stress, potentially affecting clinical treatment. We compared psychological therapy outcomes between LGB and heterosexual patients by gender.

methodsRetrospective cohort data were obtained from seven NHS talking therapy services in London, from April 2013 to December 2023. Of 100,389 patients, 94,239 reported sexual orientation, 7,422 identifying as LGB. The primary outcome was reliable recovery from anxiety and depression. Secondary outcomes were reliable improvement, depression and anxiety severity, therapy attrition, and engagement. Analyses were stratified by gender and employed multilevel regression models, adjusting for sociodemographic and clinical covariates.

resultsAfter adjustment, gay men had higher odds of reliable recovery (OR: 1.23, 95% CI: 1.13-1.34) and reliable improvement (OR: 1.16, 95% CI: 1.06-1.28) than heterosexual men, with lower attrition (OR: 0.88, 95% CI: 0.80-0.97) and greater reductions in depression (MD: 0.51, 95% CI: 0.28-0.74) and anxiety (MD: 0.45, 95% CI: 0.25-0.65). Bisexual men (OR: 0.67, 95% CI: 0.54-0.83) and bisexual women (OR: 0.84, 95% CI: 0.77-0.93) had lower attrition than heterosexuals. Lesbian and bisexual women, and bisexual men, attended slightly more sessions (MD: 0.02-0.03, 95% CI: 0.01-0.04) than heterosexual patients. No other differences were observed.

conclusionsDespite significant mental health burdens and stressors, LGB individuals had similar, if not marginally better, outcomes and engagement with psychological therapy compared with heterosexual patients.

Indexed as

AnxietyDepressionHeterosexualityPsychotherapySexual and Gender MinoritiesAdultFemaleHumansLondonMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesSex FactorsTreatment Outcomeanxietydepressionpsychological therapiessexual minoritiessexual orientation

Identifiers

PMID40702982
PMCPMC12315664

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.