Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40702969›Full record

ArticleAnnals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England2026

Designing a new orthopaedic trauma meeting proforma to improve documentation in a large UK teaching hospital.

D J Warrington, C R Yip, A Kassir, N Nadar, K Elcock, C Peach

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

D J WarringtonManchester Foundation NHS Trust, UK.
C R YipManchester Foundation NHS Trust, UK.
A KassirManchester Foundation NHS Trust, UK.
N NadarManchester Foundation NHS Trust, UK.
K ElcockManchester Foundation NHS Trust, UK.
C PeachManchester Foundation NHS Trust, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionIn England, around two million fractures occur annually, with 250,000 requiring hospital admission. At Wythenshawe Hospital, the Trauma and Orthopaedic service discusses 10-15 new patient cases every weekday. We aimed to design and implement a structured proforma for the trauma meeting to ensure clear documentation of trauma meeting discussions and orthopaedic plans for each new patient at Wythenshawe Hospital.

methodsBased on a literature search, input from orthopaedic surgeons and analysis of existing documentation, we created a proforma. We collected data in four phases: pre-implementation (1-10 October 2022), post-initial proforma (11-20 October 2022), post-updated proforma (20-30 October 2022) and long-term effectiveness (20-24 November 2023).

resultsPhase 1: 90 cases reviewed; 64% had inadequate documentation. Key details were often missing. Phase 2: After proforma implementation, 98 cases reviewed; documentation increased to 94%. Significant improvements in recording consultant names (92%), imaging (59%) and diagnosis (80%). Phase 3: After feedback update, 108 cases reviewed; 88% had documentation. Improvements in documentation of imaging (85%) and weight-bearing status (57%). Phase 4: One year later, 85 cases reviewed; documentation at 84%. Key details such as consultant names and imaging reached 100% completion, diagnosis at 97%.

conclusionsThis study proposes a standardised trauma meeting proforma to enhance the efficiency and accuracy of trauma meeting documentation. Our findings highlight the need for professional bodies to establish guidelines for trauma meeting handovers. We encourage further research into effective trauma meetings and suggest our proforma as a template for other orthopaedic departments to adapt to their needs.

Indexed as

DocumentationFractures, BoneHospitals, TeachingOrthopedicsHumansQuality ImprovementUnited KingdomDocumentationOrthopaedicQuality improvementTrauma meeting

Identifiers

PMID40702969
PMCPMC12949692

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.