ArticleEnvironmental microbiology2025
Exploring Energy Conservation in Sulphate-Dependent Anaerobic Methane-Oxidising Consortia Through Metabolic Modelling.
Article in Environmental microbiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Exploring Energy Conservation in Sulphate-Dependent Anaerobic Methane-Oxidising Consortia Through Metabolic Modelling.Environmental microbiology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Anaerobic oxidation of methane (AOM) coupled with sulphate reduction (SR) is a crucial microbial process that mitigates methane emissions, a major contributor to climate change. However, the bioenergetics underlying this process remains poorly understood. Here, we present a metabolic model to quantify energy fluxes and conservation in AOM consortia by integrating enzyme-level thermodynamics and kinetics. Unlike previous models that impose artificial constraints on energy conservation kinetics and efficiency, our approach mechanistically predicts ATP yields and energy efficiencies. We show that both anaerobic methanotrophic archaea (ANME) and sulphate-reducing bacteria (SRB) invest energy in substrate activation, synthesising ATP with comparable yields (0.23-0.24 mol ATP per mol methane or sulphate), while achieving remarkable thermodynamic efficiency (~60%). However, ANME exhibit a higher return on investment (ROI, 18%) than SRB (11%) due to more efficient substrate activation. These findings highlight fundamental bioenergetic constraints governing methane oxidation and SR in anoxic environments, enhancing our understanding of how microbial processes regulate methane fluxes in natural ecosystems. By providing a quantitative framework for microbial energy conservation, our study advances biogeochemical modelling and informs strategies for methane mitigation in marine sediments and other anaerobic environments critical to climate regulation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.