SynthesisJournal of cosmetic dermatology2025
Aging and Herbal Interventions: Mechanistic Insights and Therapeutic Potential.
Synthesis in Journal of cosmetic dermatology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Aging and Herbal Interventions: Mechanistic Insights and Therapeutic Potential.Journal of cosmetic dermatology · 2025Pooled it
- Insect-Derived Anti-Aging Bioresources: Current Status, Bottlenecks, and Future Directions.Insects · 2026Review
- Targeting oxidative stress, senescence, and neurodegeneration: anti-aging perspectives of Urtica dioica and Centella asiatica.Inflammopharmacology · 2026Review
- Development and characterization of dibenzalacetone-loaded oleogels as a potential photoprotective agents for sunscreen formulations.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Comparison of the effects of pure vitamin E and combined conservative therapy for precancerous cervical lesions cultivated on a microfluidic chip.Open medicine (Warsaw, Poland) · 2026Article
- Bioactive compounds of Ganoderma species: molecular mechanisms and therapeutic potential in cancer and metabolic disorders.World journal of microbiology & biotechnology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSkin aging is a multifactorial process influenced by an individual's genetic predisposition, lifestyle choices, and environmental factors. This process leads to epidermal thinning, a reduction in collagen and elastin levels, and a decrease in skin suppleness. While aging cannot be entirely prevented, its effects can be mitigated through the application of appropriate skincare products.
aimThis review examines the potential of natural herbal extracts in anti-aging skincare formulations, focusing on their bioactivity and safety, which aligns with current consumer trends favoring natural, organic, and eco-friendly products.
methodsA systematic literature review was performed with the help of PubMed and ScienceDirect to thoroughly examine articles between 2000 and 2025. The review made use of key phrases including "skin aging," "herbal extracts," and "anti-aging cosmetics."
resultsBioactive compounds such as polyphenols, flavonoids, and essential oils, present in plants, confer multiple benefits for the skin, including moisturizing properties, barrier repair agents, antioxidants, sunscreens, and anti-inflammatory effects. These compounds also protect and rejuvenate the skin through distinct anti-aging mechanisms.
conclusionThe use of herbal extracts in combination with nano-formulations enhances the efficacy of skincare regimens while improving stability. The integration of plant-based resources, when combined with a balanced diet and a healthy lifestyle, can significantly enhance holistic and effective anti-aging skincare.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.