Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40702882›Full record

ArticleInterventional neuroradiology : journal of peritherapeutic neuroradiology, surgical procedures and related neurosciences2025

Cost impact of balloon guide catheter with mechanical thrombectomy for acute ischemic stroke: Analysis from the United States, Canada, and seven European countries.

Levansri Makalanda, Alex Mortimer, Eva Gonzalez-Diaz, Hendramoorthy Maheswaran, Shanti Scheffler, Emilie Kottenmeier, Waleed Brinjikji

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Interventional neuroradiology : journal of peritherapeutic neuroradiology, surgical procedures and related neurosciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Levansri MakalandaDepartment of Interventional Neuroradiology, Royal London Hospital, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-6637-9293
Alex MortimerDepartment of Neurointervention, Southmead Hospital, North Bristol NHS Trust, Bristol, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-7744-2833
Eva Gonzalez-DiazDepartment of Interventional Neuroradiology, Hospital Universitario De Cruces, Barakaldo, País Vasco, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-2749-7155
Hendramoorthy MaheswaranGlobal Health Economics, Johnson & Johnson MedTech, London, UK.
Shanti SchefflerHealth Economics & Market Access, Johnson & Johnson MedTech, Zug, Switzerland.
Emilie KottenmeierHealth Economics & Market Access, Johnson & Johnson MedTech Neurovascular, Irvine, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9039-2823
Waleed BrinjikjiDepartment of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BackgroundBalloon guide catheters (BGCs) are adjunctive devices that may be used during mechanical thrombectomy (MT) to induce flow arrest and improve clot retrieval and reperfusion outcomes for acute ischemic stroke. As the cost-effectiveness of BGC use remains uncertain, this study assessed short- and long-term direct healthcare costs associated with BGC use versus standard guide catheters (SGC) during MT.MethodsA decision tree model estimated the short-term costs (index hospitalization), long-term costs (one year after index hospitalization), and total costs for patients undergoing MT + BGC versus MT + SGC from a healthcare system perspective in the United States (US), Canada, United Kingdom (UK), Sweden, Germany, Italy, Spain, Belgium, and The Netherlands. Average device costs were sourced from public tender prices and market research data. Weighted average healthcare costs for modified Rankin Scale scores were sourced from published literature for the respective countries. A 2024 meta-analysis supporting improved outcomes with BGC provided input parameters to model treatment effects for BGC and SGC. Deterministic one-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses evaluated the robustness of model parameters and accounted for uncertainty.ResultsAcross all countries, long-term and total per-patient costs were lower with MT + BGC, yielding total per-patient cost savings of $6297 (US), CAD 3006 (Canada), £1828 (UK), 28,950 kr (Sweden), €1077 (Germany), €709 (Italy), €3678 (Spain), €2259 (Belgium), and €3344 (The Netherlands). The probability of MT + BGC yielding cost savings ranged 0.356-0.911 (short term), 0.962-0.975 (long term), and 0.838-0.935 (total costs). While long-term and total costs consistently favored MT + BGC, short-term cost savings showed more variability across countries.ConclusionThis study demonstrates that BGC use is associated with total one-year per-patient cost savings for inpatient and postdischarge stroke care across the US, Canada, and seven European healthcare systems. Balloon guide catheters can potentially reduce post-stroke care costs and should be considered more broadly, despite the additional cost incurred by the device.

Indexed as

balloon guide cathetercosts and cost analysisendovascular proceduresIschemic strokethrombectomy

Identifiers

PMID40702882
PMCPMC12289623

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.