ArticleOrthopaedic surgery2025
Measurements of Posterior Tibial Slope of the Ankle Joint on CT Images and Virtual Radiographs.
Article in Orthopaedic surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Measurements of Posterior Tibial Slope of the Ankle Joint on CT Images and Virtual Radiographs.Orthopaedic surgery · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveThe posterior tibial slope (PTS) is essential in the assessment of ankle alignment. However, its standardized reference value has not been adequately investigated. This study aims to compare the PTS of the ankle joint on virtual radiographs and CT images and determine the effect of participants' demographic characteristics on the PTS.
methodsA retrospective analysis was conducted in healthy populations who underwent CT scans of the ankle joint. A total of 106 participants (53 males and 53 females) were included in our study. The three-dimensional model of the ankle joint was reconstructed by CT images, and the standard coronal and sagittal planes were produced using the anatomical coordinate system. The PTS was measured on different CT sagittal planes and virtual radiographs. All measurements were performed using three reference axes, including the anterior cortex axis, the anatomical axis, and the posterior cortex axis of the tibial shaft. Subgroup and correlation analyses were performed to investigate the effect of participants' demographic characteristics (the age, height, gender, and BMI) on the PTS. Statistical comparisons between two groups were performed using independent t-tests, while variations across sagittal planes and reference axes were analyzed through one-way analysis of variance.
resultsThe mean values of PTS varied from 76.7° to 83.4° on different sagittal planes of CT images, and there was an increasing trend for PTS from the medial to lateral CT images. The mean values of PTS on the virtual radiograph were 81.6°, 82.3°, and 80.8° for the anterior cortex, anatomical, and posterior cortex axes, respectively. Significant differences in PTS measurements were found between CT images and virtual radiographs (p < 0.05). However, no differences were found while using different reference axes on PTS measurements (p < 0.05). Subgroup analysis showed females had a greater PTS than males, indicating a gender-based difference in the anatomy of the PTS.
conclusionThe PTS varied on CT images and radiographs, and the anterior cortex, anatomical, and posterior cortex axes do not significantly influence the PTS measurements. The observed gender-based differences highlight the need for individualized surgical planning and the development of sex-specific implants.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.