Observational studyPhysiotherapy research international : the journal for researchers and clinicians in physical therapy2025
Severity Classification of Functional Impairment Based on ICF Qualifiers: A New Proposal for Assessing Individuals With Pulmonary Hypertension.
Observational study in Physiotherapy research international : the journal for researchers and clinicians in physical therapy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Exploring clinician-reported assessments of capacity and performance qualifiers in the ICF: a scoping review.Frontiers in rehabilitation sciences · 2026Review
- Severity Classification of Functional Impairment Based on ICF Qualifiers: A New Proposal for Assessing Individuals With Pulmonary Hypertension.Physiotherapy research international : the journal for researchers and clinicians in physical therapy · 2025Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundPulmonary Hypertension (PH) is a chronic condition that leads to progressive functional limitations, making the assessment of functional capacity essential for clinical management. This study aimed to classify PH patients based on the International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health (ICF) qualifiers using the Six-Minute Walk Test (6MWT) and compare this classification with the World Health Organization Functional Classification (WHO-FC).
methodsThis observational study included 33 individuals with PH. Demographic data, pulmonary function, and 6MWT results were collected. Participants were classified according to ICF qualifiers (ranging from no impairment to complete impairment) and WHO-FC. The association between classifications was tested using Fisher's exact test, considering the conceptual differences between them.
resultsMost participants presented moderate functional impairment, with an average 6MWT distance of 431.5 ± 110 m, equivalent to 68% of the predicted value. Based on ICF qualifiers, 39% of patients had mild impairment, 42% moderate, and 18% severe impairment. However, no significant association was found between ICF qualifiers and WHO-FC, reflecting the distinct conceptual frameworks of these classifications. Unlike WHO-FC, which applies fixed cutoffs, the ICF-based classification provides a more individualized assessment by incorporating the contrast between expected and actual performance in the 6MWT. DISCUSSION: The use of ICF qualifiers enabled a more specific evaluation of functional capacity in PH patients, complementing rather than replacing WHO-FC. This approach allows for a more individualized assessment, supporting targeted rehabilitation strategies and improving clinical decision-making in PH management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.