Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40702600›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of animal ecology2025

Tropical fishes can benefit more from novel than familiar species interactions at their cold-range edges.

Angus Mitchell, Chloe Hayes, Ericka O C Coni, David J Booth, Ivan Nagelkerken

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of animal ecology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Angus MitchellSouthern Seas Ecology Laboratories, School of Biological Sciences, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2255-9652
Chloe HayesSouthern Seas Ecology Laboratories, School of Biological Sciences, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6115-3903
Ericka O C ConiSouthern Seas Ecology Laboratories, School of Biological Sciences, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
David J BoothSchool of the Life Sciences, University of Technology Sydney, Ultimo, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8256-1412
Ivan NagelkerkenSouthern Seas Ecology Laboratories, School of Biological Sciences, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4499-3940

Funding

Australian Research Council DP170101722Australian Research Council DP230101932
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Animals extending their biogeographic ranges poleward under global warming often interact with local species for limited resources such as food and shelter. Whether such novel species interactions facilitate or inhibit range extensions remains largely unknown. We evaluated how range-extending tropical and co-shoaling temperate fishes modify their behaviours (aggression, foraging and anti-predator) along a 2000-km latitudinal gradient encapsulating tropical, subtropical and temperate reefs in a global ocean warming hotspot. All five tropical fish species showed increased anti-predator behaviours and decreased bite rate at their novel temperate range compared to their native tropical and subtropical ranges. However, when shoaling with temperate fishes, three of five tropical fish species had higher bite rates and all five tropical fish species spent less time sheltering compared to tropical-only shoals, irrespective of biogeographic region. In their subtropical ranges, tropical fish were more aggressive towards co-shoaling temperate fish compared to their poleward novel cold ranges. This increased tropical fish aggression resulted in increased fleeing responses by the two temperate fishes at their subtropical warm trailing edges compared to their warm- and cold-temperate core ranges. Our findings suggest that tropical fish species trade-off foraging efficiency for anti-predator behaviour in their novel warm- and cold-temperate ranges, independent of shoaling interactions. However, shoaling with temperate species can increase the foraging efficiency of tropical fishes, which may be a mechanism (phenotypic plasticity) that enhances their performance at their leading temperate range edges. Since novel species interactions enhanced the behavioural performance of some tropical fishes, we conclude that behavioural interactions between range-extending and local species can facilitate successful range extensions of some species into novel environments.

Indexed as

Animal DistributionBehavior, AnimalFishesAggressionAnimalsFeeding BehaviorGlobal WarmingSpecies SpecificityTropical Climateanti‐predator behaviourcompetitionneophobiaocean warmingphenotypic plasticityrange shiftsspecies interactionstropical fish

Identifiers

PMID40702600
PMCPMC12484409

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.