Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40702554›Full record

ArticleInternational journal for equity in health2025

How do World Health Organization technical officers working on noncommunicable diseases approach health equity?

Michelle Amri, Khadija Rashid, Makda Habtegergesa, Jesse B Bump

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal for equity in health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Michelle AmriThe W. Maurice Young Centre for Applied Ethics, School of Population and Public Health, University of British Columbia, 2206 East Mall, Room 209, Vancouver, BC, V6T 1Z3, Canada. michelleamri@gmail.com.
Khadija RashidSchool of Policy Studies, Queen's University, Mackintosh-Corry Hall, C321, 68 University Avenue, Kingston, ON, K7L 3N6, Canada.
Makda HabtegergesaDepartment of Political Science, University of Calgary, 2500 University Drive NW, Calgary, AB, T2N 1N4, Canada.
Jesse B BumpTakemi Program in International Health, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, 665 Huntington Avenue, Bldg. 1, Boston, MA, 02115-6021, United States of America.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionHealth equity has become a common objective in both global and public health. Although there has been recent scholarship to critically examine how this concept has been applied by the World Health Organization (WHO), there has not been any detailed investigation into the WHO's work on noncommunicable diseases (NCDs). This study aims to fill this gap by investigating the approaches taken by WHO technical officers working on NCDs to address health equity.

methodsThe perspectives of technical officers working on NCDs at the WHO were collated through semi-structured key informant interviews. Interviews were transcribed verbatim to facilitate data analysis by two independent reviewers in NVivo 14.

resultsKey informants felt: a disconnect between NCDs programmatic efforts and health equity; that equity in health primarily involves ensuring equitable access to healthcare, with an emphasis on addressing financial hardship; and that equity in health entails targeting those who are most 'vulnerable'. In investigating how health equity is being applied in NCD efforts, it was apparent that a consideration of health equity is missing in program implementation and policy design, and that donors' goals supersede long-term prevention efforts. Lastly, in pinpointing concrete changes or results seen around how health equity is operationalized in NCDs efforts, several success stories from various regions emerge.

conclusionThe findings of this study demonstrate that WHO technical officers working on NCDs often possessed a limited understanding of health equity that resulted in little meaningful action to embed health equity considerations into programmatic and policy work. Evidently, WHO technical officers need to better navigate or contest industry interference and learn more about health equity as a concept and the links to NCDs.

Indexed as

Health EquityNoncommunicable DiseasesWorld Health OrganizationGlobal HealthHealth Services AccessibilityHumansInterviews as Topic

Identifiers

PMID40702554
PMCPMC12285130

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.