ArticleBMC sports science, medicine & rehabilitation2025
Effect of resistance training on kinetic and kinematic indicators in jump athletes: a systematic review.
Article in BMC sports science, medicine & rehabilitation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Effects of acute caffeine ingestion combined with post-activation potentiation enhancement on the anaerobic capacity of male collegiate basketball players.Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition · 2026Trial
- Training Sequence Matters: Neuromuscular Training Followed by Small-Sided Games Enhances Physical Fitness and Soccer-Specific Performance in Prepubertal Soccer Players.Journal of functional morphology and kinesiology · 2026Article
- The Effects of Plyometric Training on Selected Neuromuscular Outcomes in Trained-to-Highly Trained Male Boulder Climbers: A Preliminary Exploratory Trial.Sports (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Field-Based Concurrent Validity and Test-Retest Reliability of a Portable Force Platform During IMTP and Countermovement Jump Assessments.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Effects of the Abdominal Draw-In Maneuver with Manual Resistance on Lumbopelvic Muscle Activity and Lateral Pelvic Tilt During Side-Lying Hip Abduction.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Article
- No improvement in maximum jumping height in experienced and less experienced jumpers following a single session of transabdominal, transcutaneous spinal anodal direct current stimulation.Frontiers in physiology · 2026Article
- Effects of the Combined Abdominal Draw-In Maneuver and Manual Resistance on Lumbopelvic Muscle Activity and Anterior Pelvic Tilt During Prone Hip Extension.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundHigh, long, and triple jumps are athletic jumping events. Although they differ in technique and rules, they share many similar biomechanical characteristics. Resistance training is a key method for enhancing jumping performance and has gained attention. Different resistance training methods have been shown to significantly improve jumping performance. However, current research on these events remains insufficient, particularly in systematically analysing kinetic and kinematic indicators, exploring their relationships, and summarising common characteristics, which are crucial. These gaps hinder a deeper understanding of how resistance training affects jumping performance.
objectiveTo explore the relationship between kinetic and kinematic indicators, examining how resistance training influences force conversion into momentum, optimises body movement coordination, and enhances take-off performance in jumping events.
resultsThe quality assessment results showed that four randomised controlled trials (RCTs) were evaluated using the ROB-2 tool. Among them, two studies raised concerns about bias related to the randomisation process, and one study also exhibited bias due to deviations from the intended interventions. Five non-randomised intervention studies were assessed using the ROBINS-I tool, with two studies judged to have a moderate risk of bias due to confounding factors. Overall, five studies were identified as having a moderate risk of bias or raising concerns in specific areas. Kinematic indicators (e.g., squat jump, countermovement jump, high jump height, standing long jump, and standing triple jump) showed significant improvements. Jump height significantly improved (SMD = 0.99; 95% CI = 0.56-1.41, P < 0.0001), and jump distance improved significantly (SMD = 1.67; 95% CI = 0.93-2.40, P < 0.0001).
conclusionThis review examines the significant effects of resistance training on kinetic and kinematic indicators of jumping performance, emphasizing its critical role in enhancing athletic performance. Resistance training significantly improves explosive power, take-off force, and maximal strength, particularly through exercises like squat jumps, which are closely linked to enhanced jump performance. Additionally, neuromuscular adaptations stabilize the output of antagonist muscles, further supporting performance enhancement. In terms of kinematic indicators, resistance training enhances jump height and distance, with methods such as plyometric and barbell jump training proving especially effective. These methods are beneficial for elite athletes and those with some training experience. However, the research highlights that gender and athletic level influence training outcomes, with females generally showing less improvement. The review also underscores the need for more high-quality randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to validate these findings further, as most current studies rely on non-randomized controlled trials (non-RCTs). SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero , Identifier: CRD42025628838.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.