Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40702534›Full record

ArticleBMC sports science, medicine & rehabilitation2025

Effect of resistance training on kinetic and kinematic indicators in jump athletes: a systematic review.

Wenchao Rong, Kim Geok Soh, Shamsulariffin Samsudin, Yue Zhao, Xinzhi Wang, Xinrui Zhang, Liang Cao

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC sports science, medicine & rehabilitation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Wenchao RongFaculty of Sports Studies, Faculty of Educational Studies, University Putra Malaysia, Serdang 43400, Selangor, Malaysia. gs64109@student.upm.edu.my.
Kim Geok SohFaculty of Sports Studies, Faculty of Educational Studies, University Putra Malaysia, Serdang 43400, Selangor, Malaysia. kims@upm.edu.my.
Shamsulariffin SamsudinFaculty of Sports Studies, Faculty of Educational Studies, University Putra Malaysia, Serdang 43400, Selangor, Malaysia.
Yue ZhaoFaculty of Sports Studies, Faculty of Educational Studies, University Putra Malaysia, Serdang 43400, Selangor, Malaysia.
Xinzhi WangFaculty of Sports Studies, Faculty of Educational Studies, University Putra Malaysia, Serdang 43400, Selangor, Malaysia.
Xinrui ZhangFaculty of Sports Studies, Faculty of Educational Studies, University Putra Malaysia, Serdang 43400, Selangor, Malaysia.
Liang CaoPhysical Education Faculty,Qinhuangdao city , Yanshan University, Hebei Province, 066000, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHigh, long, and triple jumps are athletic jumping events. Although they differ in technique and rules, they share many similar biomechanical characteristics. Resistance training is a key method for enhancing jumping performance and has gained attention. Different resistance training methods have been shown to significantly improve jumping performance. However, current research on these events remains insufficient, particularly in systematically analysing kinetic and kinematic indicators, exploring their relationships, and summarising common characteristics, which are crucial. These gaps hinder a deeper understanding of how resistance training affects jumping performance.

objectiveTo explore the relationship between kinetic and kinematic indicators, examining how resistance training influences force conversion into momentum, optimises body movement coordination, and enhances take-off performance in jumping events.

resultsThe quality assessment results showed that four randomised controlled trials (RCTs) were evaluated using the ROB-2 tool. Among them, two studies raised concerns about bias related to the randomisation process, and one study also exhibited bias due to deviations from the intended interventions. Five non-randomised intervention studies were assessed using the ROBINS-I tool, with two studies judged to have a moderate risk of bias due to confounding factors. Overall, five studies were identified as having a moderate risk of bias or raising concerns in specific areas. Kinematic indicators (e.g., squat jump, countermovement jump, high jump height, standing long jump, and standing triple jump) showed significant improvements. Jump height significantly improved (SMD = 0.99; 95% CI = 0.56-1.41, P < 0.0001), and jump distance improved significantly (SMD = 1.67; 95% CI = 0.93-2.40, P < 0.0001).

conclusionThis review examines the significant effects of resistance training on kinetic and kinematic indicators of jumping performance, emphasizing its critical role in enhancing athletic performance. Resistance training significantly improves explosive power, take-off force, and maximal strength, particularly through exercises like squat jumps, which are closely linked to enhanced jump performance. Additionally, neuromuscular adaptations stabilize the output of antagonist muscles, further supporting performance enhancement. In terms of kinematic indicators, resistance training enhances jump height and distance, with methods such as plyometric and barbell jump training proving especially effective. These methods are beneficial for elite athletes and those with some training experience. However, the research highlights that gender and athletic level influence training outcomes, with females generally showing less improvement. The review also underscores the need for more high-quality randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to validate these findings further, as most current studies rely on non-randomized controlled trials (non-RCTs). SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero , Identifier: CRD42025628838.

Indexed as

Jumping performanceKinematic indicatorsKinetic indicatorsResistance training

Identifiers

PMID40702534
PMCPMC12285116

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.