ArticleBMC sports science, medicine & rehabilitation2025
The effectiveness of modified constraint-induced movement therapy on upper limb function in children with cerebral palsy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Article in BMC sports science, medicine & rehabilitation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveModified constraint-induced movement therapy (m-CIMT) has been increasingly employed in the rehabilitation of upper limb function in children with cerebral palsy (CP). However, its effectiveness remains inconclusive. This study aimed to evaluate the therapeutic impact of m-CIMT on upper limb function in children with CP.
methodsA systematic search was performed across six electronic databases-China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Wanfang, PubMed, Web of Science, the Cochrane Library, and Embase-from their inception to May 6, 2025. Only randomized controlled trials (RCTs) examining the effects of m-CIMT on upper limb function in children with CP were included. All outcomes related to upper limb function-regardless of the specific measurement tools used-were treated as indicators of the same functional improvement goal, and modeled using a three-level meta-analytic approach, which accounts for sampling variance, within-study variance, and between-study variance. The study design was specified in this section to avoid redundancy in the objective. The Cochrane Risk of Bias 2.0 (RoB 2.0) tool was used to assess methodological quality, and the GRADE approach was employed to evaluate the certainty of the evidence. Data synthesis was conducted using the metafor package in R, generating forest plots, funnel plots, and conducting sensitivity analyses, subgroup analyses, and Egger's test for publication bias.
resultsA total of ten studies met the inclusion criteria. The overall risk of bias was low for most outcomes, with eleven outcomes rated as low risk across all assessed domains. A few outcomes were rated as having some concerns or high risk, primarily due to unblinded subjective outcome reporting. The meta-analysis indicated that m-CIMT may have a positive effect on upper limb function in children with CP (g = 0.58, 95% CI [0.02, 1.14], P = 0.043; 95% PI [- 1.17, 2.33]). However, evidence of publication bias was detected (t = 5.58, P < 0.001), and the overall quality of evidence was rated as very low. Subgroup analysis revealed that the "type of constraint used" significantly moderated the intervention effect (F(2, 51) = 3.69, P = 0.032).
conclusionBased on the current evidence, m-CIMT may improve upper limb function in children with CP, but due to the very low certainty of evidence and potential publication bias, these findings should be interpreted with caution. Further high-quality randomized controlled trials with standardized protocols and longer follow-up are needed. Future research should also focus on individualized treatment approaches to support the implementation of m-CIMT as an evidence-based precision rehabilitation strategy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.