Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40702499›Full record

ReviewJournal of ethnobiology and ethnomedicine2025

From forgotten to frontier: vindicating Latin America's indigenous biotechnology.

Francisca Villanueva-Flores, Igor Garcia-Atutxa

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of ethnobiology and ethnomedicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Francisca Villanueva-FloresCentro de Investigación en Ciencia Aplicada y Tecnología Avanzada (CICATA), Unidad Morelos del Instituto Politécnico Nacional (IPN), Boulevard de la Tecnología No. 1036, 62790, Xochitepec, Mexico. fvillanuevaf@ipn.mx.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6092-4211
Igor Garcia-AtutxaUniversidad Católica de Murcia (UCAM), Av. de los Jerónimos, 135, 30107, Murcia, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0002-1551-2685

Funding

Secretaría de Investigación y Posgrado, Instituto Politécnico Nacional SIP20242814, SIP20250306, SIP20251096, and SIP20254781
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study provides a critical reassessment of indigenous Latin American biotechnologies, uniquely integrating ethnographic, historical, and biochemical analyses to reveal their scientific sophistication and contemporary potential. It examines ancestral practices historically overlooked or marginalized, such as microbial fermentation in traditional beverages (masato, pozol, and pulque), medicinal and nutritional uses of plant mucilages, and natural encapsulation methods using clays and plant-derived polymers. We demonstrate that these indigenous biotechnological systems represent more than ethnographic curiosities; they are early examples of empirical technologies anticipating fundamental principles now central to probiotics, encapsulation pharmacology, and sustainable agriculture. By spotlighting previously under-documented practices and emphasizing their deep cultural and ecological integration, this review fosters a more inclusive understanding of scientific knowledge. It underscores both the ethical and epistemological imperative to recognize and incorporate indigenous innovations into contemporary scientific frameworks. This novel perspective not only recovers and revalues historically marginalized knowledge but also promotes intercultural collaboration, ultimately strengthening sustainability and modern biotechnological innovation.

Indexed as

BiotechnologyHumansIndigenous PeoplesLatin AmericaEthnobiologyEthnopharmacologyIndigenous biotechnologyMicrobial fermentation

Identifiers

PMID40702499
PMCPMC12288233

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.