Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40702460›Full record

ArticleBMC infectious diseases2025

Effect of ivermectin on scabies: a retrospective evaluation.

Ömer Karakoyun, Erhan Ayhan, İsmail Yıldız

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC infectious diseases, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Ömer KarakoyunDepartment of Dermatology and Venereal Diseases, Dicle University Faculty of Medicine, Diyarbakir, Türkiye.
Erhan AyhanDepartment of Dermatology and Venereal Diseases, Dicle University Faculty of Medicine, Diyarbakir, Türkiye. magnetar21@hotmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1416-2636
İsmail YıldızDepartment of Biostatistics, Dicle University Faculty of Medicine, Diyarbakir, Türkiye.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThis study, aimed at determining the effect of ivermectin on scabies, which has recently reached epidemic proportions, was conducted by the Department of Dermatology and Venereology at Dicle University. The study aims to evaluate the success of ivermectin in the treatment of scabies, identify variables affecting this success, and contribute positively to the development of future national treatment protocols. Additionally, the study seeks to test the hypothesis that ivermectin, which is significantly easier to use in cases of failure with topical treatments, is a good first-line treatment option. MATERIALS AND

methodsIn this retrospective study, 412 patients diagnosed with scabies via clinical examination by a specialist physician and recommended a 200 µg/kg dose of ivermectin at one-week intervals, who presented to Dicle University Dermatology and Venereology Clinic between January 1, 2023, and June 30, 2024, were examined. Fifty-two patients whose records lacked the parameters evaluated in the study were excluded. A total of 360 patients were included in the study. Data on children under five years of age, those weighing less than 15 kg, and pregnant or lactating women were not obtained due to insufficient information regarding oral ivermectin use in these groups. Data were evaluated with SPSS-21.0 statistical program and the value, mean, median value, standard deviation, incidence rate and frequency of each parameter in total patients were recorded. Associations were analysed using Kolmogorov-Smirnov test, dependent t test, Wilcoxon test, Pearson Chi-square (χ2) test, Yates Chi-square (χ2) test, Fisher Chi-square (χ2) test analysis, Mc-Nemar test, Pearson/spearman correlation analysis, logistic regression analysis. A p-value of < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

resultsThe ivermectin treatments for all 360 patients were prescribed by a specialist physician, and 78.6% (283) of the patients benefited from the treatment. Of these 360 patients, 295 (81.94%) had tried at least one other treatment option before ivermectin and did not benefit from it, while 66.1% (43 out of 65) of those who had not previously undergone treatment benefited from ivermectin. Furthermore, 81.36% (240 out of 295) of patients who did not respond to previous treatments benefited from ivermectin.

conclusionThis study concluded that ivermectin could be a significant treatment option for patients diagnosed with scabies. The superiority of appropriately dosed ivermectin treatment over other treatments was observed, particularly in patients resistant to other scabies treatments.

Indexed as

Antiparasitic AgentsIvermectinScabiesAdolescentAdultAgedChildChild, PreschoolFemaleHumansInfantMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeYoung AdultAntiparasitic AgentsIvermectinIvermectinScabiesTreatment

Identifiers

PMID40702460
PMCPMC12288330

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.