Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40702434›Full record

ArticleBMC genomics2025

Population-level gene copy number variations reveal distinct genetic properties of different Malus species.

Aafreen Sakina, Can Alkan, Awais Khan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC genomics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Aafreen SakinaPlant Pathology and Plant-Microbe Biology Section, School of Integrative Plant Science, Cornell University, Geneva, NY, USA.
Can AlkanDepartment of Computer Engineering, Bilkent University, Ankara, Türkiye.
Awais KhanPlant Pathology and Plant-Microbe Biology Section, School of Integrative Plant Science, Cornell University, Geneva, NY, USA. awais.khan@cornell.edu.

Funding

USDA-NIFA Specialty Crop Research Initiative (SCRI) grant 1023572 (subaward RC111414A)
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCopy number variations (CNVs) are crucial in plant evolution, adaptation, and domestication. In this study, we explored how CNVs contribute to genetic diversity, evolution, and adaptation during apple domestication. We examined the genome-wide CNV profiles and segmental duplications (SDs) in 116 Malus accessions, including domesticated apple (Malus domestica) and its primary progenitor species (M. sieversii and M. sylvestris).

resultsOn average, two accessions of the same species showed differences in at least 7,000 genes with varying copy number (CN) profiles. In contrast, accessions from different species had at least 20,000 genes with differing CN profiles. Notably, 700 genes exhibited distinct CN profiles between M. domestica and M. sieversii, with an enrichment in defense response genes. Genes related to fruit ripening, flavor, and anthocyanin biosynthesis had higher copy numbers in M. domestica. Additionally, 360 genes showed differential CN profiles between M. domestica and M. sylvestris, with enrichment in polygalacturonase activity, which may influence differences in fruit flavor. The study also identified 3,000 genes with significant CN differentiation (V

conclusionsThese findings offer valuable insights into the evolutionary mechanisms driving apple domestication and adaptation and provide a comprehensive resource for future research and apple breeding.

Indexed as

DNA Copy Number VariationsMalusSegmental Duplications, GenomicApplesCopy number variations (CNVs)Population structureSegmental duplicationsSelection signatures

Identifiers

PMID40702434
PMCPMC12285163

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.