ArticleBMC health services research2025
Strategies for enhancing PHC accessibility through mobile and capsule clinics: a spatial location allocation study in China.
Article in BMC health services research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundShortages in the Primary Health Care (PHC) workforce, especially in remote areas, pose a major challenge to achieving universal health coverage. Traditional strategies focused solely on hiring village doctors face limitations due to recruitment challenges in these regions. This study proposes a multi-strategy approach to PHC workforce allocation to address spatial imbalances and improve healthcare accessibility and equity.
methodsWe developed a Multi-Strategy PHC Workforce Location Allocation model that integrates three strategies: hiring village doctors, deploying mobile clinics, and establishing capsule clinics. The model aims to minimize patient impedance while considering constraints such as service coverage, capacity, and budget. Using Beijing's suburban areas as a case study, we conducted empirical runs to compare two models. The first is a single-strategy model that relies solely on hiring village doctors. The second is a multi-strategy model that combines hiring village doctors with mobile and capsule clinics. Data were collected from 34 towns, 823 villages, and 894 medical facilities. We evaluated the models based on impedance, cost, accessibility, and Gini coefficients, which were calculated using methods such as the two-step floating catchment area approach.
resultsCompared with the single-strategy approach, the multi-strategy model consistently achieves higher coverage, lower impedance, better accessibility, and improved equity under the same budget. For example, with a 10% budget parameter, it covers 19.23% more villages in deep mountainous areas and improves accessibility in the plains, near mountainous, and deep mountainous areas by 1.59%, 4.80%, and 4.44%, respectively, outperforming the single-strategy model. As government investment increases, the improvement in impedance shows a trend of diminishing marginal returns.
conclusionsIntegrating hiring village doctors with mobile and capsule clinics offers a flexible and effective solution for addressing PHC workforce shortages in remote areas. This multi-strategy approach not only improves healthcare accessibility and fairness but also achieves higher financial efficiency. We recommend that governments adopt this comprehensive strategy, especially in resource-constrained regions, to achieve universal PHC service coverage.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.