ArticleBMC bioinformatics2025
DiffCoRank: a comprehensive framework for discovering hub genes and differential gene co-expression in brain implant-associated tissue responses.
Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Chronic alteration of CaBiomaterials · 2026Article
- Molecular Mechanisms of Foreign Body Responses to Neural Electrodes and Surface Biofunctionalization Strategies for Interface Modulation.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- The Tale of the Guanosine Tract in Repeat Expansion Disorders.Molecular neurobiology · 2026Review
- Spatial transcriptomics on an expanded dataset at the brain-electrode interface: exploration of variability and identification of novel biomarkers.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2026Article
- Chronic alteration of CabioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundBrain implants have significant potential for therapeutic applications and neuroscience research, but complex tissue responses often compromise their long-term stability. To address this challenge, differential coexpression analysis can be used to identify key molecular regulators involved in brain implant responses.
resultsWe developed DiffCoRank, an integrated framework that improves differential coexpression analysis by integrating the techniques of RNA-Seq data preprocessing, gene filtering, correlation-based module identification, and network analysis to discover differentially coexpressed gene clusters. A key innovation of our approach is false discovery rate (FDR) based selection of strongly connected genes (SCGs), by which we improve detection of strong coexpression patterns that otherwise could be lost to spurious correlations. To enhance the identification of different modules, we employ a hybrid clustering technique that combines uniform manifold approximation and projection (UMAP) with density-based spatial clustering of applications with noise (DBSCAN). We propose a multi-criteria hub gene ranking system incorporating network centrality metrics such as degree, closeness, betweenness, and eigenvector centrality to prioritise biologically relevant genes. Additionally, we created a user-friendly application to visualize and explore the results of DiffCoRank interactively.
conclusionsOur method successfully identified key gene modules involved in oxidative stress, calcium signaling, immunological regulation, autophagic recovery, and vascular remodeling in RNA-Seq data of implanted rat brain tissue. Furthermore, we compared our results to those of other existing coexpression analysis frameworks, showing that our method successfully identifies unique regulatory processes and consistent coexpression patterns. Our research offers novel insights into the molecular processes that explain implant-tissue interactions and possible approaches to improve the robustness and biocompatibility of brain interfaces.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.