ArticleBMC public health2025
Suboptimal distribution and utilization of antenatal care given bed Nets undermine pregnant women's protection in Benin: a prospective field study.
Article in BMC public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe World Health Organization (WHO) recommends that pregnant women in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) receive a free long-lasting insecticidal net (LLIN) during their first antenatal care (ANC) visit to prevent malaria. This study, conducted in Benin, evaluates the distribution and utilization rates of LLINs provided at the first ANC visit among pregnant women.
methodsData were collected from 14 public and private health centers located in urban and rural areas across Southern, Central, and Northern Benin. Pregnant women were enrolled in the study during their initial ANC visit and were subsequently visited at home twice, where a questionnaire was administered. The study assessed the distribution and use of LLINs during the first ANC visit. After the second home visit, the LLIN found on the pregnant women's sleeping unit was collected to evaluate its physical integrity and bio-efficacy. Chi-square tests were used to compare each indicator across three variables: region, urban/rural setting, and public/private status of health centers.
resultsA total of 718 pregnant women were included in the study. LLIN ownership and usage before the first ANC visit were 94% [89-97%] and 93% [85-97%], respectively. During the first ANC visit, 63% [40-80%] of the pregnant women received an LLIN, but only 11% [7-22%] installed it on their sleeping area. During the pregnancy period, 72% [64-78%] of the LLINs in use were found to be either physically damaged or not bio-effective.
conclusionThe distribution of LLINs to pregnant women during their first ANC visit was inadequate, with only a small fraction of recipients actively using the net. This shortfall leads to suboptimal protection for this vulnerable population during pregnancy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.