SynthesisThe Journal of manual & manipulative therapy2026
Safety and anatomical accuracy of dry needling procedures in musculoskeletal system: a systematic review of cadaveric studies.
Synthesis in The Journal of manual & manipulative therapy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Mechanical Analysis of Needles Used in Ultrasound-Guided Musculoskeletal Interventions.Physiological research · 2026Article
- Safety and Anatomical Accuracy of Dry Needling of the Quadratus Femoris Muscle: A Cadaveric Study.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionIn recent years, invasive physiotherapy techniques have seen a significant rise in use for the treatment of musculoskeletal pain. However, there is currently no standardization in the anatomical landmarks, needle length, and insertion angles applied across different muscles, which is critical for ensuring both safety and reliability, especially in non-ultrasound-guided interventions.
objectiveTo analyze the results of studies evaluating invasive puncture techniques performed on cadaveric specimens and to assess their methodological quality.
methodsA systematic review was conducted according to PRISMA guidelines. A comprehensive search was performed in the MEDLINE, Scopus, Web of Science, CINAHL, and SPORTDiscus databases, including all records up to 23 December 2024. Studies were included if they assessed the anatomical safety and procedural accuracy of invasive physiotherapy techniques on cadavers. The quality of reporting was assessed using the QUACS scale, and risk of bias was evaluated with the JBI Critical Appraisal Checklist for Systematic Reviews.
resultsTwenty-one cadaveric observational studies were included. All studies demonstrated anatomically safe approaches, with no reported injury to adjacent neural or vascular structures. However, there was variability in methodological quality and consistency in reporting across studies. The mean QUACS score across the included studies was 8.95 out of 13, corresponding to an average methodological quality of 68.84% (30.76% to 92.30%).
conclusionThe current evidence supports the anatomical safety of invasive physiotherapy techniques applied to cadavers. Nevertheless, the development and implementation of standardized, reproducible protocols are necessary to improve the consistency, safety, and clinical applicability of these interventions, particularly when performed without ultrasound guidance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.