ArticleJournal of neuro-oncology2025
Clinical and neuropathological criteria for distinguishing between IDH-mutant astrocytomas of WHO grade 2 and 3.
Article in Journal of neuro-oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe 2021 WHO classification of CNS tumors allows flexibility in the grading of IDH-mutant astrocytic gliomas, leading to some ambiguity. Following the approval of vorasidenib for WHO grade 2 astrocytomas and oligodendrogliomas based on the positive Phase III INDIGO trial, identifying prognostic criteria to differentiate between grade 2 and grade 3 tumors has become increasingly important.
methodsWe retrospectively searched our institutional database for patients meeting the diagnostic criteria for IDH-mutant astrocytomas (grade 2 and 3) according to the WHO 2021 classification. Clinical, radiological and molecular data were collected; outcome was compared using log-rank analysis and prognostic markers were subsequently forwarded in a multivariate model.
resultsWe identified 91 patients with IDH-mutant astrocytomas with available neuropathological and clinical data, including 61 WHO grade 2 (67.0%) and 30 WHO grade 3 (33.0%) tumors. At a median follow-up of 89 months, median progression-free survival was 67 months for WHO grade 2 and 53 months for WHO grade 3 tumors. Median overall survival was 216 months for WHO grade 3 tumors, while it was not reached for WHO grade 2 tumors. Univariate analysis showed that higher WHO grade, increased mitotic count, elevated Ki67 indices and preoperative contrast enhancement were associated with poorer outcomes; however, only contrast enhancement retained prognostic significance on multivariate analysis (p = 0.03 for overall survival, p = 0.02 for progression-free survival).
conclusionWhile our findings await confirmation in larger prospective cohorts, neuropathological grading criteria might need to be accompanied by clinical information including contrast enhancement to prognostically distinguish grade 2 from grade 3 tumors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.