Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40702314›Full record

ArticleHeredity2026

Experimental test of the fitness effects of divergent marine-freshwater chromosomal inversions in stickleback under different salinity conditions.

Juliana Rodríguez-Fuentes, Nicole Nesvadba, Verena Saladin, Marius Roesti, Catherine L Peichel

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Heredity, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Juliana Rodríguez-FuentesDivision of Evolutionary Ecology, Institute of Ecology and Evolution, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-9825-9912
Nicole NesvadbaDivision of Evolutionary Ecology, Institute of Ecology and Evolution, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Verena SaladinDivision of Evolutionary Ecology, Institute of Ecology and Evolution, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Marius RoestiDivision of Evolutionary Ecology, Institute of Ecology and Evolution, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-7408-4804
Catherine L PeichelDivision of Evolutionary Ecology, Institute of Ecology and Evolution, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland. catherine.peichel@unibe.ch.ORCID 0000-0002-7731-8944

Funding

Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung (Swiss National Science Foundation) 310030_204681/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chromosomal inversions are a type of structural variant that have long interested evolutionary biologists because of their potential role in local adaptation and speciation. However, direct experimental evidence for the fitness consequences of inversions is rare, limiting our ability to dissect the evolutionary forces associated with the spread and maintenance of inversions in natural populations. We tackle this knowledge gap by studying the fitness effects of three chromosomal inversions that consistently differ between marine and freshwater populations of threespine sticklebacks (Gasterosteus aculeatus). Using controlled laboratory crosses, we tested whether inversion genotype influences fitness (measured as survival, standard length, and body condition) across two salinity treatments (freshwater vs saltwater). In both the freshwater and the saltwater treatments, there were no deviations from Mendelian ratios at any of the three inversions. This suggests that there are no intrinsic deleterious effects of these inversions, in contrast to observations from other systems. Overall, there was no effect of inversion genotype on standard length or body size across the two salinity treatments for the chromosome XI and XXI inversions. For the chromosome I inversion, heterozygotes had a slightly lower body condition in the freshwater treatment. Together, these results suggest that the fitness effects of these inversions are not strongly influenced by salinity and that other selective forces might be involved in their evolution. More broadly, these findings highlight the importance of performing empirical tests of fitness effects of chromosomal inversions to better explain their spread and maintenance in nature.

Indexed as

Chromosome InversionGenetic FitnessSalinitySmegmamorphaAnimalsFemaleFresh WaterGenotypeMaleSeawater

Identifiers

PMID40702314
PMCPMC13031518

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.