ArticleHeredity2026
Experimental test of the fitness effects of divergent marine-freshwater chromosomal inversions in stickleback under different salinity conditions.
Article in Heredity, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Parallel adaptation to geothermally-warmed habitats due to common structural variation and functional developmental pathways.Nature communications · 2026Article
- The genomic architecture of local adaptation in two connected populations of three-spined stickleback.G3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2026Article
- Complex Patterns of Hitchhiking Mutation Load Among Stickleback Populations.Genome biology and evolution · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Chromosomal inversions are a type of structural variant that have long interested evolutionary biologists because of their potential role in local adaptation and speciation. However, direct experimental evidence for the fitness consequences of inversions is rare, limiting our ability to dissect the evolutionary forces associated with the spread and maintenance of inversions in natural populations. We tackle this knowledge gap by studying the fitness effects of three chromosomal inversions that consistently differ between marine and freshwater populations of threespine sticklebacks (Gasterosteus aculeatus). Using controlled laboratory crosses, we tested whether inversion genotype influences fitness (measured as survival, standard length, and body condition) across two salinity treatments (freshwater vs saltwater). In both the freshwater and the saltwater treatments, there were no deviations from Mendelian ratios at any of the three inversions. This suggests that there are no intrinsic deleterious effects of these inversions, in contrast to observations from other systems. Overall, there was no effect of inversion genotype on standard length or body size across the two salinity treatments for the chromosome XI and XXI inversions. For the chromosome I inversion, heterozygotes had a slightly lower body condition in the freshwater treatment. Together, these results suggest that the fitness effects of these inversions are not strongly influenced by salinity and that other selective forces might be involved in their evolution. More broadly, these findings highlight the importance of performing empirical tests of fitness effects of chromosomal inversions to better explain their spread and maintenance in nature.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.