Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40702301›Full record

ArticleNature human behaviour2025

Feature-based reward learning shapes human social learning strategies.

David Schultner, Lucas Molleman, Björn Lindström

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature human behaviour, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Semantic knowledge guides innovation and drives cultural evolution.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. How social learning enhances-or undermines-efficiency and flexibility in collective decision-making under uncertainty.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

David SchultnerDepartment of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden. david.schultner@ki.se.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2253-4065
Lucas MollemanDepartment of Psychology, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7978-7173
Björn LindströmDepartment of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden. bjorn.lindstrom@ki.se.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2121-8370

Funding

Knut och Alice Wallenbergs Stiftelse (Knut and Alice Wallenberg Foundation) KAW 2021.0148
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Human adaptation depends on individuals strategically choosing whom to learn from. A mosaic of social learning strategies-such as copying majorities or successful others-has been identified. Influential theories conceive of these strategies as fixed heuristics, independent of experience. However, such accounts cannot explain the flexibility and individual variability prevalent in social learning. Here we advance a domain-general reward learning framework that provides a unifying mechanistic account of pivotal social learning strategies. We first formalize how individuals learn to associate social features (for example, others' behaviour or success) with reward. Across six experiments (n = 1,941), we show that people flexibly adjust their social learning in response to experienced rewards. Agent-based simulations further demonstrate how this learning process gives rise to key social learning strategies across a range of environments. Our findings suggest that people learn how to learn from others, enabling adaptive knowledge to spread dynamically throughout societies.

Indexed as

LearningRewardSocial LearningAdultFemaleHumansMaleYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID40702301
PMCPMC12545201

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.