Observational studyGeroScience2026
Predicting delirium in critically Ill COVID-19 patients using EEG-derived data: a machine learning approach.
Observational study in GeroScience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Delirium is a severe and common complication among critically ill patients, particularly those with SARS-CoV-2 infection, contributing to increased morbidity and mortality. Early identification of at-risk patients is crucial for timely intervention and improved outcomes. This prospective observational cohort study explores the potential of electroencephalography (EEG) combined with machine learning (ML) models for predicting delirium in critically ill patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection. A stepwise modeling approach was applied, starting with the independent analysis of specific EEG variables to assess their predictive value. Subsequently, three ML models were developed using data from 70 patients (31 with delirium, 39 without): two relied solely on EEG data, while the third integrated demographic, clinical, laboratory, and EEG data. An additional model analyzed EEG data before and after delirium diagnosis in 11 patients. Several EEG features were identified as predictors of delirium, with increased theta activity emerging as the most consistent. The best EEG-only model achieved an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.733 (sensitivity = 0.645, specificity = 0.692), indicating moderate predictive performance. Including demographic, clinical, and laboratory variables improved performance (AUC = 0.825, sensitivity = 0.613, specificity = 0.795). The model analyzing EEG features before and after delirium diagnosis achieved the highest accuracy (AUC = 0.950, sensitivity and specificity = 0.818), reinforcing the value of EEG-based monitoring. EEG-based ML models show promise for predicting delirium in critically ill patients, with increased theta activity identified as a key predictor. However, their moderate AUC, sensitivity, and specificity highlight the need for further refinement.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.